TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating a Prototype Clinical Decision Support Tool for Chronic Pain Treatment in Primary Care
AU - Allen, Katie S.
AU - Danielson, Elizabeth C.
AU - Downs, Sarah M.
AU - Mazurenko, Olena
AU - Diiulio, Julie
AU - Salloum, Ramzi G.
AU - Mamlin, Burke W.
AU - Harle, Christopher A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was supported by Grant R01HS023306 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Designing User-Centered Decision Support Tools for Primary Care Pain Management.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Institute of Physics Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/11/2
Y1 - 2022/11/2
N2 - Objectives â The Chronic Pain Treatment Tracker (Tx Tracker) is a prototype decision support tool to aid primary care clinicians when caring for patients with chronic noncancer pain. This study evaluated clinicians' perceived utility of Tx Tracker in meeting information needs and identifying treatment options, and preferences for visual design. Methods â We conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with primary care clinicians from four health systems in Indiana. The interviews were conducted in two waves, with prototype and interview guide revisions after the first six interviews. The interviews included exploration of Tx Tracker using a think-Aloud approach and a clinical scenario. Clinicians were presented with a patient scenario and asked to use Tx Tracker to make a treatment recommendation. Last, participants answered several evaluation questions. Detailed field notes were collected, coded, and thematically analyzed by four analysts. Results â We identified several themes: The need for clinicians to be presented with a comprehensive patient history, the usefulness of Tx Tracker in patient discussions about treatment planning, potential usefulness of Tx Tracker for patients with high uncertainty or risk, potential usefulness of Tx Tracker in aggregating scattered information, variability in expectations about workflows, skepticism about underlying electronic health record data quality, interest in using Tx Tracker to annotate or update information, interest in using Tx Tracker to translate information to clinical action, desire for interface with visual cues for risks, warnings, or treatment options, and desire for interactive functionality. Conclusion â Tools like Tx Tracker, by aggregating key information about past, current, and potential future treatments, may help clinicians collaborate with their patients in choosing the best pain treatments. Still, the use and usefulness of Tx Tracker likely relies on continued improvement of its functionality, accurate and complete underlying data, and tailored integration with varying workflows, care team roles, and user preferences.
AB - Objectives â The Chronic Pain Treatment Tracker (Tx Tracker) is a prototype decision support tool to aid primary care clinicians when caring for patients with chronic noncancer pain. This study evaluated clinicians' perceived utility of Tx Tracker in meeting information needs and identifying treatment options, and preferences for visual design. Methods â We conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with primary care clinicians from four health systems in Indiana. The interviews were conducted in two waves, with prototype and interview guide revisions after the first six interviews. The interviews included exploration of Tx Tracker using a think-Aloud approach and a clinical scenario. Clinicians were presented with a patient scenario and asked to use Tx Tracker to make a treatment recommendation. Last, participants answered several evaluation questions. Detailed field notes were collected, coded, and thematically analyzed by four analysts. Results â We identified several themes: The need for clinicians to be presented with a comprehensive patient history, the usefulness of Tx Tracker in patient discussions about treatment planning, potential usefulness of Tx Tracker for patients with high uncertainty or risk, potential usefulness of Tx Tracker in aggregating scattered information, variability in expectations about workflows, skepticism about underlying electronic health record data quality, interest in using Tx Tracker to annotate or update information, interest in using Tx Tracker to translate information to clinical action, desire for interface with visual cues for risks, warnings, or treatment options, and desire for interactive functionality. Conclusion â Tools like Tx Tracker, by aggregating key information about past, current, and potential future treatments, may help clinicians collaborate with their patients in choosing the best pain treatments. Still, the use and usefulness of Tx Tracker likely relies on continued improvement of its functionality, accurate and complete underlying data, and tailored integration with varying workflows, care team roles, and user preferences.
KW - Chronic
KW - Clinical decision support
KW - Pain
KW - Usability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131270260&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85131270260&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/s-0042-1749332
DO - 10.1055/s-0042-1749332
M3 - Article
C2 - 35649500
AN - SCOPUS:85131270260
SN - 1869-0327
VL - 13
SP - 602
EP - 611
JO - Applied Clinical Informatics
JF - Applied Clinical Informatics
IS - 3
ER -