TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating and improving the implementation of a community-based hereditary cancer screening program
AU - Greenberg, Samantha
AU - Yashar, Beverly M.
AU - Pearlman, Mark
AU - Duquette, Deb
AU - Milliron, Kara
AU - Marvin, Monica
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding information Partial funding for this project was provided by the National Society of Genetic Counselors Education Special Interest Group and the University of Michigan Genetic Counseling Research Grant.
Funding Information:
The authors on this paper would like to thank the Planned Parenthood Federation of America staff (Deborah Nucatola, Courtney Benedict, Zoe Unger, and Karen Shea) and Mary Kint Petit at Planned Parenthood of Mid and South Michigan for their support of this research. Additionally, many thanks are extended to the organizations and individuals that created the resources used for the educational webinars including the American Cancer Society, Dr. Cecilia Bellcross, MySupport360 Hereditary Cancer, Kara Milliron, Chris Chapman, and Marc Stephens. A large thank you is also extended to Ilana Miller for her transcription work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2019/1/30
Y1 - 2019/1/30
N2 - Healthcare disparities exist in the provision of cancer genetic services including genetic counseling and testing related to BRCA1/2 mutations. To address this in a community health setting a screening tool was created to identify high-risk women. This study evaluates the implementation of the tool and identifies opportunities for improved cancer genetic screening, including regular clinician education. A mixed-method approach was used to evaluate clinician utilization of the screening tool at Planned Parenthood affiliates. Novel surveys that evaluated acceptance and implementation were administered to clinicians (n = 14) and semi-structured interviews (n = 6) were used to explore clinicians’ perspectives and identify gaps in its utilization. Educational modules that addressed gaps were developed, implemented, and evaluated using a post-education survey (n = 8). Clinicians reported confidence in administering and interpreting the screening tool, but reported less confidence in their knowledge of cancer genetics and ability to connect clients with genetic counseling and testing (p =.003). Educational modules resulted in significant gains in clinician knowledge on genetic topics (p <.05) and increased self-reported confidence in connecting clients with genetic services. The modules reinforced the belief that genetic testing is beneficial for patients at increased risk (p =.001) and is important to inform subsequent medical management (p =.027). While building community clinicians’ capacity to connect clients with genetic services is crucial, it is challenged by knowledge and confidence gaps in discussions of genetic services with clients. Consistent genetic-focused education with non-genetic clinicians can improve confidence and knowledge, enabling a more effective screening program in community health settings.
AB - Healthcare disparities exist in the provision of cancer genetic services including genetic counseling and testing related to BRCA1/2 mutations. To address this in a community health setting a screening tool was created to identify high-risk women. This study evaluates the implementation of the tool and identifies opportunities for improved cancer genetic screening, including regular clinician education. A mixed-method approach was used to evaluate clinician utilization of the screening tool at Planned Parenthood affiliates. Novel surveys that evaluated acceptance and implementation were administered to clinicians (n = 14) and semi-structured interviews (n = 6) were used to explore clinicians’ perspectives and identify gaps in its utilization. Educational modules that addressed gaps were developed, implemented, and evaluated using a post-education survey (n = 8). Clinicians reported confidence in administering and interpreting the screening tool, but reported less confidence in their knowledge of cancer genetics and ability to connect clients with genetic counseling and testing (p =.003). Educational modules resulted in significant gains in clinician knowledge on genetic topics (p <.05) and increased self-reported confidence in connecting clients with genetic services. The modules reinforced the belief that genetic testing is beneficial for patients at increased risk (p =.001) and is important to inform subsequent medical management (p =.027). While building community clinicians’ capacity to connect clients with genetic services is crucial, it is challenged by knowledge and confidence gaps in discussions of genetic services with clients. Consistent genetic-focused education with non-genetic clinicians can improve confidence and knowledge, enabling a more effective screening program in community health settings.
KW - Access to genetic services
KW - BRCA1/2 mutations
KW - Cancer genetic services
KW - Cancer risk evaluation
KW - Genetic education
KW - Medically underserved populations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045149983&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045149983&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12687-018-0357-5
DO - 10.1007/s12687-018-0357-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 29508367
AN - SCOPUS:85045149983
SN - 1868-310X
VL - 10
SP - 51
EP - 60
JO - Journal of Community Genetics
JF - Journal of Community Genetics
IS - 1
ER -