Evaluating framing effects

James N. Druckman*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

123 Scopus citations


This paper examines Tversky and Kahneman's well-known Asian disease framing problem (A. Tversky, D. Kahneman, Science 211 (1981) 453-458). I describe an experiment where respondents received a version of the disease problem using a survival format, a mortality format, or both formats. The results from the survival and mortality formats replicate Tversky and Kahneman's original experiment both in terms of statistical significance and, in contrast to some other studies, in terms of magnitude. I then argue that the "both format" condition constitutes an important and previously unused baseline for evaluating the strength of framing effects. This standard of comparison provides a way to evaluate the impact of a frame on unadulterated preferences - that is, preferences unaffected by a particular frame. The implications for future framing effect experiments are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-101
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Economic Psychology
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 1 2001


  • Framing Effect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Applied Psychology
  • Economics and Econometrics


Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating framing effects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this