TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating the Potential of Marginal Land for Cellulosic Feedstock Production and Carbon Sequestration in the United States
AU - Emery, Isaac
AU - Mueller, Steffen
AU - Qin, Zhangcai
AU - Dunn, Jennifer B.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Max Burnette and Charles Linville at Ploughman Analytics for their extensive contributions to the GIS analyses. We also acknowledge Rose Hart for many helpful discussions of data analysis and visualization and Michael Wang for helpful discussions. This work was supported by the Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) of the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy of the United States Department of Energy, under contract DE-AC02-06CH11357. This research was supported in part by an appointment to the Postgraduate Research Participation Program at the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and USAFIT. We thank Kristen Johnson, Alicia Lindauer, and Zia Haq of BETO for support and guidance.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2017/1/3
Y1 - 2017/1/3
N2 - Land availability for growing feedstocks at scale is a crucial concern for the bioenergy industry. Feedstock production on land not well-suited to growing conventional crops, or marginal land, is often promoted as ideal, although there is a poor understanding of the qualities, quantity, and distribution of marginal lands in the United States. We examine the spatial distribution of land complying with several key marginal land definitions at the United States county, agro-ecological zone, and national scales, and compare the ability of both marginal land and land cover data sets to identify regions for feedstock production. We conclude that very few land parcels comply with multiple definitions of marginal land. Furthermore, to examine possible carbon-flow implications of feedstock production on land that could be considered marginal per multiple definitions, we model soil carbon changes upon transitions from marginal cropland, grassland, and cropland-pastureland to switchgrass production for three marginal land-rich counties. Our findings suggest that total soil organic carbon changes per county are small, and generally positive, and can influence life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of switchgrass ethanol. (Figure Presented).
AB - Land availability for growing feedstocks at scale is a crucial concern for the bioenergy industry. Feedstock production on land not well-suited to growing conventional crops, or marginal land, is often promoted as ideal, although there is a poor understanding of the qualities, quantity, and distribution of marginal lands in the United States. We examine the spatial distribution of land complying with several key marginal land definitions at the United States county, agro-ecological zone, and national scales, and compare the ability of both marginal land and land cover data sets to identify regions for feedstock production. We conclude that very few land parcels comply with multiple definitions of marginal land. Furthermore, to examine possible carbon-flow implications of feedstock production on land that could be considered marginal per multiple definitions, we model soil carbon changes upon transitions from marginal cropland, grassland, and cropland-pastureland to switchgrass production for three marginal land-rich counties. Our findings suggest that total soil organic carbon changes per county are small, and generally positive, and can influence life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of switchgrass ethanol. (Figure Presented).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009737097&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009737097&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.6b04189
DO - 10.1021/acs.est.6b04189
M3 - Article
C2 - 27976872
AN - SCOPUS:85009737097
SN - 0013-936X
VL - 51
SP - 733
EP - 741
JO - Environmental Science and Technology
JF - Environmental Science and Technology
IS - 1
ER -