Evaluating theoretical predictions in the social sciences: Coalition theories and other models

J. Keith Murnighan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of how a researcher might evaluate the accuracy of theoretical predictions in the social sciences. Using theories of coalition systems as an example of specific and apparently easily testable models, the paper argues that judgment of the absolute accuracy of a prediction remains a value judgment. In addition, a strict value judgment can potentially lead to the rejection of a theory and its underlying assumptions even when those assumptions may have, at the very least, considerable heuristic value. While most models in the social sciences would benefit from greater specificity in their predictions, the general thrust of specific coalition models would benefit from greater attention. Combining a general conceptual structure with a set of specific, falsifiable predictions makes for excellent theory and potentially greater research progress.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)125-130
Number of pages6
JournalBehavioral Science
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1982

Fingerprint

social sciences
Social Sciences
prediction
Research Personnel
researchers
Research

Keywords

  • accuracy
  • coalition theory
  • decider subsystem
  • group
  • organization
  • society
  • supranational system

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{a8d99fa25b5b41168227d1c20c80f34c,
title = "Evaluating theoretical predictions in the social sciences: Coalition theories and other models",
abstract = "This paper addresses the issue of how a researcher might evaluate the accuracy of theoretical predictions in the social sciences. Using theories of coalition systems as an example of specific and apparently easily testable models, the paper argues that judgment of the absolute accuracy of a prediction remains a value judgment. In addition, a strict value judgment can potentially lead to the rejection of a theory and its underlying assumptions even when those assumptions may have, at the very least, considerable heuristic value. While most models in the social sciences would benefit from greater specificity in their predictions, the general thrust of specific coalition models would benefit from greater attention. Combining a general conceptual structure with a set of specific, falsifiable predictions makes for excellent theory and potentially greater research progress.",
keywords = "accuracy, coalition theory, decider subsystem, group, organization, society, supranational system",
author = "Murnighan, {J. Keith}",
year = "1982",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/bs.3830270205",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "125--130",
journal = "Behavioral Science",
issn = "0005-7940",
publisher = "Behavioral Neuropsychiatry",
number = "2",

}

Evaluating theoretical predictions in the social sciences : Coalition theories and other models. / Murnighan, J. Keith.

In: Behavioral Science, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.01.1982, p. 125-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating theoretical predictions in the social sciences

T2 - Coalition theories and other models

AU - Murnighan, J. Keith

PY - 1982/1/1

Y1 - 1982/1/1

N2 - This paper addresses the issue of how a researcher might evaluate the accuracy of theoretical predictions in the social sciences. Using theories of coalition systems as an example of specific and apparently easily testable models, the paper argues that judgment of the absolute accuracy of a prediction remains a value judgment. In addition, a strict value judgment can potentially lead to the rejection of a theory and its underlying assumptions even when those assumptions may have, at the very least, considerable heuristic value. While most models in the social sciences would benefit from greater specificity in their predictions, the general thrust of specific coalition models would benefit from greater attention. Combining a general conceptual structure with a set of specific, falsifiable predictions makes for excellent theory and potentially greater research progress.

AB - This paper addresses the issue of how a researcher might evaluate the accuracy of theoretical predictions in the social sciences. Using theories of coalition systems as an example of specific and apparently easily testable models, the paper argues that judgment of the absolute accuracy of a prediction remains a value judgment. In addition, a strict value judgment can potentially lead to the rejection of a theory and its underlying assumptions even when those assumptions may have, at the very least, considerable heuristic value. While most models in the social sciences would benefit from greater specificity in their predictions, the general thrust of specific coalition models would benefit from greater attention. Combining a general conceptual structure with a set of specific, falsifiable predictions makes for excellent theory and potentially greater research progress.

KW - accuracy

KW - coalition theory

KW - decider subsystem

KW - group

KW - organization

KW - society

KW - supranational system

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84980144475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84980144475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bs.3830270205

DO - 10.1002/bs.3830270205

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84980144475

VL - 27

SP - 125

EP - 130

JO - Behavioral Science

JF - Behavioral Science

SN - 0005-7940

IS - 2

ER -