Evaluation of a Mastery Learning Intervention on Hospitalists' Code Status Discussion Skills

Rashmi K. Sharma*, Eytan Szmuilowicz, Adeboye Ogunseitan, Sasha F. Jones, Jessica A Montalvo, Kevin John O'Leary, Diane Bronstein Wayne

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context Although code status discussions (CSD) occur frequently in the hospital setting, discussions often lack content necessary for informed decision making. Simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) has been used to improve clinical skills among resident physicians and may provide a novel way to improve hospitalists' CSD skills. Objectives The objective of this pilot randomized controlled trial was to develop and evaluate a CSD SBML intervention for hospitalists. Methods Twenty hospitalists were randomized to control vs. a CSD SBML intervention. Hospitalists conducted a baseline standardized patient encounter (pretest) that was scored using a 19-item CSD checklist and controls completed a repeat standardized patient encounter six months later (post-test). Intervention group hospitalists received at least one two-hour training session featuring deliberate practice and feedback and were expected to meet a minimum passing score (MPS) on the post-test of 84% set by an expert panel. Results Only two of the 20 hospitalists met the MPS at pretest. Seventy percentage of intervention hospitalists achieved the MPS after a single training session. Post-test median checklist scores were higher for intervention hospitalists compared with controls (16.5 vs. 12.0, P = 0.0001). Intervention hospitalists were significantly more likely to ask about previous experiences with end-of-life decision making (70% vs. 20%, P = 0.03), explore values/goals (100% vs. 50%, P = 0.01), ask permission to make a recommendation regarding code status (60% vs. 0%, P = 0.003), and align recommendations with patient values/goals (90% vs. 40%, P = 0.02) than controls. Conclusion Few hospitalists demonstrated mastery of CSD skills at baseline; SBML was an effective way to improve these skills.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1066-1070
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume53
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

Hospitalists
Learning
Checklist
Decision Making
Clinical Competence
Randomized Controlled Trials

Keywords

  • Code status
  • mastery learning
  • medical education
  • palliative care
  • physician-patient communication
  • resuscitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

@article{0109062d9e944fe28510bde71246acac,
title = "Evaluation of a Mastery Learning Intervention on Hospitalists' Code Status Discussion Skills",
abstract = "Context Although code status discussions (CSD) occur frequently in the hospital setting, discussions often lack content necessary for informed decision making. Simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) has been used to improve clinical skills among resident physicians and may provide a novel way to improve hospitalists' CSD skills. Objectives The objective of this pilot randomized controlled trial was to develop and evaluate a CSD SBML intervention for hospitalists. Methods Twenty hospitalists were randomized to control vs. a CSD SBML intervention. Hospitalists conducted a baseline standardized patient encounter (pretest) that was scored using a 19-item CSD checklist and controls completed a repeat standardized patient encounter six months later (post-test). Intervention group hospitalists received at least one two-hour training session featuring deliberate practice and feedback and were expected to meet a minimum passing score (MPS) on the post-test of 84{\%} set by an expert panel. Results Only two of the 20 hospitalists met the MPS at pretest. Seventy percentage of intervention hospitalists achieved the MPS after a single training session. Post-test median checklist scores were higher for intervention hospitalists compared with controls (16.5 vs. 12.0, P = 0.0001). Intervention hospitalists were significantly more likely to ask about previous experiences with end-of-life decision making (70{\%} vs. 20{\%}, P = 0.03), explore values/goals (100{\%} vs. 50{\%}, P = 0.01), ask permission to make a recommendation regarding code status (60{\%} vs. 0{\%}, P = 0.003), and align recommendations with patient values/goals (90{\%} vs. 40{\%}, P = 0.02) than controls. Conclusion Few hospitalists demonstrated mastery of CSD skills at baseline; SBML was an effective way to improve these skills.",
keywords = "Code status, mastery learning, medical education, palliative care, physician-patient communication, resuscitation",
author = "Sharma, {Rashmi K.} and Eytan Szmuilowicz and Adeboye Ogunseitan and Jones, {Sasha F.} and Montalvo, {Jessica A} and O'Leary, {Kevin John} and Wayne, {Diane Bronstein}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.341",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "1066--1070",
journal = "Journal of Pain and Symptom Management",
issn = "0885-3924",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Evaluation of a Mastery Learning Intervention on Hospitalists' Code Status Discussion Skills. / Sharma, Rashmi K.; Szmuilowicz, Eytan; Ogunseitan, Adeboye; Jones, Sasha F.; Montalvo, Jessica A; O'Leary, Kevin John; Wayne, Diane Bronstein.

In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. 53, No. 6, 01.06.2017, p. 1066-1070.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of a Mastery Learning Intervention on Hospitalists' Code Status Discussion Skills

AU - Sharma, Rashmi K.

AU - Szmuilowicz, Eytan

AU - Ogunseitan, Adeboye

AU - Jones, Sasha F.

AU - Montalvo, Jessica A

AU - O'Leary, Kevin John

AU - Wayne, Diane Bronstein

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Context Although code status discussions (CSD) occur frequently in the hospital setting, discussions often lack content necessary for informed decision making. Simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) has been used to improve clinical skills among resident physicians and may provide a novel way to improve hospitalists' CSD skills. Objectives The objective of this pilot randomized controlled trial was to develop and evaluate a CSD SBML intervention for hospitalists. Methods Twenty hospitalists were randomized to control vs. a CSD SBML intervention. Hospitalists conducted a baseline standardized patient encounter (pretest) that was scored using a 19-item CSD checklist and controls completed a repeat standardized patient encounter six months later (post-test). Intervention group hospitalists received at least one two-hour training session featuring deliberate practice and feedback and were expected to meet a minimum passing score (MPS) on the post-test of 84% set by an expert panel. Results Only two of the 20 hospitalists met the MPS at pretest. Seventy percentage of intervention hospitalists achieved the MPS after a single training session. Post-test median checklist scores were higher for intervention hospitalists compared with controls (16.5 vs. 12.0, P = 0.0001). Intervention hospitalists were significantly more likely to ask about previous experiences with end-of-life decision making (70% vs. 20%, P = 0.03), explore values/goals (100% vs. 50%, P = 0.01), ask permission to make a recommendation regarding code status (60% vs. 0%, P = 0.003), and align recommendations with patient values/goals (90% vs. 40%, P = 0.02) than controls. Conclusion Few hospitalists demonstrated mastery of CSD skills at baseline; SBML was an effective way to improve these skills.

AB - Context Although code status discussions (CSD) occur frequently in the hospital setting, discussions often lack content necessary for informed decision making. Simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) has been used to improve clinical skills among resident physicians and may provide a novel way to improve hospitalists' CSD skills. Objectives The objective of this pilot randomized controlled trial was to develop and evaluate a CSD SBML intervention for hospitalists. Methods Twenty hospitalists were randomized to control vs. a CSD SBML intervention. Hospitalists conducted a baseline standardized patient encounter (pretest) that was scored using a 19-item CSD checklist and controls completed a repeat standardized patient encounter six months later (post-test). Intervention group hospitalists received at least one two-hour training session featuring deliberate practice and feedback and were expected to meet a minimum passing score (MPS) on the post-test of 84% set by an expert panel. Results Only two of the 20 hospitalists met the MPS at pretest. Seventy percentage of intervention hospitalists achieved the MPS after a single training session. Post-test median checklist scores were higher for intervention hospitalists compared with controls (16.5 vs. 12.0, P = 0.0001). Intervention hospitalists were significantly more likely to ask about previous experiences with end-of-life decision making (70% vs. 20%, P = 0.03), explore values/goals (100% vs. 50%, P = 0.01), ask permission to make a recommendation regarding code status (60% vs. 0%, P = 0.003), and align recommendations with patient values/goals (90% vs. 40%, P = 0.02) than controls. Conclusion Few hospitalists demonstrated mastery of CSD skills at baseline; SBML was an effective way to improve these skills.

KW - Code status

KW - mastery learning

KW - medical education

KW - palliative care

KW - physician-patient communication

KW - resuscitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014518749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014518749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.341

DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.341

M3 - Article

C2 - 28063865

AN - SCOPUS:85014518749

VL - 53

SP - 1066

EP - 1070

JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

SN - 0885-3924

IS - 6

ER -