Evaluation of RF interactions between a 3T birdcage transmit coil and transcranial magnetic stimulation coils using a realistically shaped head phantom

Lucia I. Navarro de Lara*, Laleh Golestanirad, Sergey N. Makarov, Jason P. Stockmann, Lawrence L. Wald, Aapo Nummenmaa

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Multichannel transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)1 is an emerging technology that allows multiple sites to be stimulated simultaneously or sequentially under electronic control without movement of the coils. A multichannel TMS/MRI head coil array for 3 Tesla is currently under development to mitigate challenges of concurrent TMS/fMRI as well as enable potential new applications. The influence of the multichannel TMS system on the MR image quality and safety must be carefully investigated. Methods: A standard birdcage volume coil for 3 Tesla systems was simulated using a commercial numerical electromagnetic solver. Two setups, consisting of 1) a MR-compatible TMS coil, and 2) a 3-axis TMS coil array, were simulated to quantify changes in the transmit field (Formula presented.) and the SAR. A realistically shaped homogeneous head model was used in the computations. Results: The stimulation coils produced enhancements and attenuations on the transmit field with effects greater than 5% up to 2.4 cm and 3.3 cm under the scalp for the MR-compatible TMS coil and 3-axis TMS coil array, respectively. The 10 g-SAR distribution did not change significantly in either of the cases; however, the nominal SAR maximum locus was shifted between existing hot spots. Conclusion: The simulated (Formula presented.) variations found near the TMS coils indicate the possibility of inducing sequence-dependent image artefacts predominatly limited to the vicinity of the coil(s). However, we conclude that neither the MR-compatible commercial TMS coil nor the 3-axis TMS coil array siginificantly elevate SAR in the head or neck beyond accepted safety limits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1061-1075
Number of pages15
JournalMagnetic resonance in medicine
Volume84
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2020

Funding

We want to thank Henrik Corfitzen (MagVenture, Farum, Denmark) for providing information about the dimensions of the MagVenture MR‐compatible TMS coil. We also thank Dr. Bastien Guerin and Dr. Thomas Witzel from MGH Martinos Center for valuable discussions on the subject. Research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under awards R01MH111829, R00EB015445, and NIH R00EB021349. Research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under awards R01MH111829, R00EB015445, and NIH R00EB021349 We want to thank Henrik Corfitzen (MagVenture, Farum, Denmark) for providing information about the dimensions of the MagVenture MR-compatible TMS coil. We also thank Dr. Bastien Guerin and Dr. Thomas Witzel from MGH Martinos Center for valuable discussions on the subject. Research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under awards R01MH111829, R00EB015445, and NIH R00EB021349. Research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under awards R01MH111829, R00EB015445, and NIH R00EB021349

Keywords

  • B 1 +
  • SAR
  • TMS
  • birdcage coil
  • fMRI
  • multichannel TMS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of RF interactions between a 3T birdcage transmit coil and transcranial magnetic stimulation coils using a realistically shaped head phantom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this