TY - JOUR
T1 - Evidence suggesting superiority of visual (verbal) vs. auditory test presentation modality in the P300-based, Complex Trial Protocol for concealed autobiographical memory detection
AU - Rosenfeld, J. Peter
AU - Ward, Anne
AU - Frigo, Vincent
AU - Drapekin, Jesse
AU - Labkovsky, Elena
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier B.V.
Copyright:
Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/4/1
Y1 - 2015/4/1
N2 - One group of participants received a series of city name stimuli presented on trials of the Complex Trial Protocol (CTP) version of a P300-based, concealed information test (CIT). Stimuli were presented on alternating trials in either auditory or visual presentation modality. In 1/7 of the trials the participant's home town (probe) repeatedly appeared in a series of 6 other (irrelevant) repeated city names. In both modalities, probe stimuli produced larger P300s than irrelevant stimuli. Visual stimuli produced shorter behavioral reaction times and P300 latencies, as well as larger P300 probe amplitudes, probe-irrelevant amplitude differences, and individual diagnostic accuracies than the same stimuli presented in the auditory modality. Possible reasons for these effects are discussed, and subject to discussed limitations, the applied conclusion reached is that in all CITs, visual presentation of stimuli, if feasible, should be preferentially used.
AB - One group of participants received a series of city name stimuli presented on trials of the Complex Trial Protocol (CTP) version of a P300-based, concealed information test (CIT). Stimuli were presented on alternating trials in either auditory or visual presentation modality. In 1/7 of the trials the participant's home town (probe) repeatedly appeared in a series of 6 other (irrelevant) repeated city names. In both modalities, probe stimuli produced larger P300s than irrelevant stimuli. Visual stimuli produced shorter behavioral reaction times and P300 latencies, as well as larger P300 probe amplitudes, probe-irrelevant amplitude differences, and individual diagnostic accuracies than the same stimuli presented in the auditory modality. Possible reasons for these effects are discussed, and subject to discussed limitations, the applied conclusion reached is that in all CITs, visual presentation of stimuli, if feasible, should be preferentially used.
KW - Concealed information tests
KW - Credibility assessment
KW - Event-related potentials
KW - Guilty knowledge tests
KW - Lie detection
KW - Memory detection
KW - P300
KW - Psychophysiological detection of deception
KW - Visual modality superiority
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925335663&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925335663&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.02.026
DO - 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.02.026
M3 - Article
C2 - 25728461
AN - SCOPUS:84925335663
SN - 0167-8760
VL - 96
SP - 16
EP - 22
JO - International Journal of Psychophysiology
JF - International Journal of Psychophysiology
IS - 1
ER -