TY - JOUR
T1 - Evoking goals to be responsible
T2 - When political cues increase utilitarian choice
AU - Gamlin, Jessica
AU - Dong, Ping
AU - Labroo, Aparna A.
AU - Robinson, Aaron
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 the Association for Consumer Research. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - Politicalsystemsenablemanygoalsthatconsumerscanaspiretowardandachieve.Whenconsumers believe the system they are embedded in is irresponsible, political cues—that is, reminders of the political system— heighten their desire for responsible governance. This desire, in turn, evokes consumers’ own goals to be responsible, increasing utilitarian (vs. hedonic) preferences. Employing quasi-experimental methods, we first show that salience of political cues accompanying Election (vs. non-Election) Day increases utilitarian preference (study 1). Employing experiments, we then show that situational political (vs. nonpolitical) cues also increase utilitarian preference, among consumers desiring responsible governance (study 2), by heightening consumers’ own goals to be responsible (studies 3A-3B). We also find marketers employ goal-consistent advertising: Political (vs. nonpolitical) podcasts include more utilitarian (vs. hedonic) product advertisements (study 4). The effects are independent of consumers’ ideology or mood. This research thus introduces novel theory incorporating the macroinstitutional influence of political cues on consumer goals and choice.
AB - Politicalsystemsenablemanygoalsthatconsumerscanaspiretowardandachieve.Whenconsumers believe the system they are embedded in is irresponsible, political cues—that is, reminders of the political system— heighten their desire for responsible governance. This desire, in turn, evokes consumers’ own goals to be responsible, increasing utilitarian (vs. hedonic) preferences. Employing quasi-experimental methods, we first show that salience of political cues accompanying Election (vs. non-Election) Day increases utilitarian preference (study 1). Employing experiments, we then show that situational political (vs. nonpolitical) cues also increase utilitarian preference, among consumers desiring responsible governance (study 2), by heightening consumers’ own goals to be responsible (studies 3A-3B). We also find marketers employ goal-consistent advertising: Political (vs. nonpolitical) podcasts include more utilitarian (vs. hedonic) product advertisements (study 4). The effects are independent of consumers’ ideology or mood. This research thus introduces novel theory incorporating the macroinstitutional influence of political cues on consumer goals and choice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087878109&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087878109&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/700844
DO - 10.1086/700844
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85087878109
SN - 2378-1815
VL - 4
SP - 87
EP - 96
JO - Journal of the Association for Consumer Research
JF - Journal of the Association for Consumer Research
IS - 1
ER -