Abstract
Depression and anxiety are highly prevalent psychological disorders; our understanding of these conditions remains limited. Efforts to explain anxiety and depression have been constrained in part by binary classification systems. Dimensional approaches to understanding psychopathology may be more effective. The present study used latent profile analysis (LPA) to assess whether unique subgroups exist within a tri-level model of anxiety and depression. Participants (N = 627) completed self-report questionnaires from which tri-level model factors were derived. LPA was conducted on those factors. A 4-profile model offered optimal fit to the data at baseline. This model was replicated at a second time point. Models derived included profiles labelled ‘Mixed Fears,’ ‘Anxious Arousal,’ ‘Low Mood/Anhedonia,’ and ‘Sub-Clinical.’ Profiles were validated at Time 1 using diagnostic status and clinical severity ratings associated with mood and anxiety presentations. Profiles demonstrated flexibility in accommodating breadth in clinical presentations and common comorbidities. Latent variable models may offer more ecologically valid approaches to understanding psychopathology.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 214-226 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment |
Volume | 44 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2022 |
Funding
This research was supported by a two-site grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) to M. G. Craske (R01-MH065651) and to S. Mineka and R. E. Zinbarg (R01-MH065652). The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIMH.
Keywords
- Anxiety
- Depression
- Dimensional
- Latent variables
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Psychology