Abstract
Growing interest surrounds transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as a safe and inexpensive method for improving cognitive functions and mood. Nevertheless, tDCS studies rarely examine psychological factors such as expectations of outcomes, which may influence tDCS responsiveness through placebo-like effects. Here we sought to evaluate the potential influence of expectations on tDCS intervention outcomes. We assessed expectations of tDCS outcomes in 88 healthy young adults on three occasions: i) at baseline; ii) after reading information implying either high or low effectiveness of stimulation; and iii) after a single-session of sham-controlled anodal tDCS applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, during working memory (WM) training. Participants were largely uncertain about the effectiveness of stimulation in improving cognitive function at baseline. High or low expectation priming using simple positive or cautionary messages significantly increased or decreased expectation ratings, respectively, but ratings significantly decreased following stimulation in all groups. We found greater improvement in participants who received high compared to low expectation priming. Participants who received active stimulation and low expectation priming exhibited the lowest performance, suggesting that expectation priming and stimulation may have interacted. We did not find a significant effect of baseline expectations, belief of group assignment, or individual characteristics on measures of WM and verbal fluency. However, controlling for baseline expectations revealed greater post-intervention improvement on the executive function measures in participants who received high (compared to low) expectation priming. People randomly assigned to receive high expectation priming reported having a more pleasant experience overall, including greater satisfaction. Our findings suggest that expectations of outcomes should be taken into account in tDCS-based experimental studies and clinical trials.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 524-534 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Neuropsychologia |
Volume | 119 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 2018 |
Funding
We thank Anita Popescu and Vilma Bezerra Alves for help with data processing, as well as Sima Sadeghinejad, Shreya Sreekantaswamy, and members of the Neuromodulation Lab at UCLA for help with data collection. We also thank Dr. Walter Dunn for helpful feedback on study design. For generous support the authors also wish to thank the Brain Mapping Medical Research Organization , Brain Mapping Support Foundation , Pierson-Lovelace Foundation , The Ahmanson Foundation , William M. and Linda R. Dietel Philanthropic Fund at the Northern Piedmont Community Foundation , Tamkin Foundation , Jennifer Jones-Simon Foundation , Capital Group Companies Charitable Foundation , Robson Family and Northstar Fund , as well as the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC, Discovery Grant), Ontario Graduate Scholarships , and Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé .
Keywords
- Expectations
- Non-invasive brain stimulation
- Placebo
- Priming
- Transcranial direct current stimulation
- Working memory
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Behavioral Neuroscience