Expedited loading with intravenous sotalol is safe and feasible—primary results of the Prospective Evaluation Analysis and Kinetics of IV Sotalol (PEAKS) Registry

Benjamin A. Steinberg*, Richard Holubkov, Thomas Deering, Christopher A. Groh, Suneet Mittal, Robert Kennedy, Parash Pokharel, Marco Perez, Salvatore Savona, Nishant Verma, Kevin Watt, Jonathan P. Piccini, T. Jared Bunch

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Loading of oral sotalol for atrial fibrillation requires 3 days, frequently in the hospital, to achieve steady state. The Food and Drug Administration approved loading with intravenous (IV) sotalol through model-informed development, without patient data. Objective: We present results of the first multicenter evaluation of this recent labeling for IV sotalol. Methods: The Prospective Evaluation Analysis and Kinetics of IV Sotalol (PEAKS) Registry was a multicenter observational registry of patients undergoing elective IV sotalol load for atrial arrhythmias. Outcomes, measured from hospital admission until first outpatient follow-up, included adverse arrhythmia events, efficacy, and length of stay. Results: Of 167 consecutively enrolled patients, 23% were female; the median age was 68 (interquartile range, 61–74) years, and the median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3 (interquartile range, 2–4). Overall, 99% were admitted for sotalol initiation (1% for dose escalation), with a target oral sotalol dose of either 80 mg twice daily (85 [51%]) or 120 mg twice daily (78 [47%]); 62 patients (37%) had an estimated creatinine clearance ≤90 mL/min. On presentation, 40% of patients were in sinus rhythm, whereas 26% underwent cardioversion before sotalol infusion. In 2 patients, sotalol infusion was stopped for bradycardia or hypotension. In 6 patients, sotalol was discontinued before discharge because of QTc prolongation (3), bradycardia (1), or recurrent atrial arrhythmia (2). The mean length of stay was 1.1 days, and 95% (n = 159) were discharged within 1 night. Conclusion: IV sotalol loading is safe and feasible for atrial arrhythmias, with low rates of adverse events, and yields shorter hospitalizations. More data are needed on the minimal duration required for monitoring in the hospital.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1134-1142
Number of pages9
JournalHeart rhythm
Volume21
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2024

Funding

The PEAKs Registry was sponsored by AltaThera, Inc. The sponsor was not involved in the drafting or editing of the manuscript.

Keywords

  • Antiarrhythmic drugs
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Intravenous sotalol
  • Outcomes
  • Registry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Expedited loading with intravenous sotalol is safe and feasible—primary results of the Prospective Evaluation Analysis and Kinetics of IV Sotalol (PEAKS) Registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this