Experimental evidence for a pure collaboration effect

Mary Caroline McGrath, Alan S. Gerber

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

Abstract

What makes us willing to sacrifice our own self-interest for another person? Humans can forgo short-term individual gain to achieve long-term benefits 1–4 —but long-run self-interest cannot fully explain unselfish behaviour 5 . Collaboration in our evolutionary past may have played a role in shaping an innate human sense of distributive justice 6 , influencing who we consider deserving of our aid or generosity. Previous research has not been able to isolate this response to collaboration as an independent effect, distinct from other motivations to share 7,8 . Here we present evidence of a pure collaboration effect, distinct from motivations of future reciprocity, in-group favouritism or concern for accountability. We demonstrate this effect among adult subjects in an economic setting, showing that the effect constitutes a psychological phenomenon with relevance for real-world social and political behaviour. This collaboration effect is substantial: it motivates sharing among people otherwise inclined to share nothing and increases the proportion of participants willing to give up half of their allotted money. We find evidence supporting our hypothesis that the collaboration effect operates by creating a sense of debt owed to one’s collaborator.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)354-360
Number of pages7
JournalNature Human Behaviour
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

Motivation
Social Responsibility
Social Justice
Economics
Psychology
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

@article{d64841e955a14743a1d66cc3fb081688,
title = "Experimental evidence for a pure collaboration effect",
abstract = "What makes us willing to sacrifice our own self-interest for another person? Humans can forgo short-term individual gain to achieve long-term benefits 1–4 —but long-run self-interest cannot fully explain unselfish behaviour 5 . Collaboration in our evolutionary past may have played a role in shaping an innate human sense of distributive justice 6 , influencing who we consider deserving of our aid or generosity. Previous research has not been able to isolate this response to collaboration as an independent effect, distinct from other motivations to share 7,8 . Here we present evidence of a pure collaboration effect, distinct from motivations of future reciprocity, in-group favouritism or concern for accountability. We demonstrate this effect among adult subjects in an economic setting, showing that the effect constitutes a psychological phenomenon with relevance for real-world social and political behaviour. This collaboration effect is substantial: it motivates sharing among people otherwise inclined to share nothing and increases the proportion of participants willing to give up half of their allotted money. We find evidence supporting our hypothesis that the collaboration effect operates by creating a sense of debt owed to one’s collaborator.",
author = "McGrath, {Mary Caroline} and Gerber, {Alan S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41562-019-0530-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "354--360",
journal = "Nature Human Behaviour",
issn = "2397-3374",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

Experimental evidence for a pure collaboration effect. / McGrath, Mary Caroline; Gerber, Alan S.

In: Nature Human Behaviour, Vol. 3, No. 4, 01.04.2019, p. 354-360.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experimental evidence for a pure collaboration effect

AU - McGrath, Mary Caroline

AU - Gerber, Alan S.

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - What makes us willing to sacrifice our own self-interest for another person? Humans can forgo short-term individual gain to achieve long-term benefits 1–4 —but long-run self-interest cannot fully explain unselfish behaviour 5 . Collaboration in our evolutionary past may have played a role in shaping an innate human sense of distributive justice 6 , influencing who we consider deserving of our aid or generosity. Previous research has not been able to isolate this response to collaboration as an independent effect, distinct from other motivations to share 7,8 . Here we present evidence of a pure collaboration effect, distinct from motivations of future reciprocity, in-group favouritism or concern for accountability. We demonstrate this effect among adult subjects in an economic setting, showing that the effect constitutes a psychological phenomenon with relevance for real-world social and political behaviour. This collaboration effect is substantial: it motivates sharing among people otherwise inclined to share nothing and increases the proportion of participants willing to give up half of their allotted money. We find evidence supporting our hypothesis that the collaboration effect operates by creating a sense of debt owed to one’s collaborator.

AB - What makes us willing to sacrifice our own self-interest for another person? Humans can forgo short-term individual gain to achieve long-term benefits 1–4 —but long-run self-interest cannot fully explain unselfish behaviour 5 . Collaboration in our evolutionary past may have played a role in shaping an innate human sense of distributive justice 6 , influencing who we consider deserving of our aid or generosity. Previous research has not been able to isolate this response to collaboration as an independent effect, distinct from other motivations to share 7,8 . Here we present evidence of a pure collaboration effect, distinct from motivations of future reciprocity, in-group favouritism or concern for accountability. We demonstrate this effect among adult subjects in an economic setting, showing that the effect constitutes a psychological phenomenon with relevance for real-world social and political behaviour. This collaboration effect is substantial: it motivates sharing among people otherwise inclined to share nothing and increases the proportion of participants willing to give up half of their allotted money. We find evidence supporting our hypothesis that the collaboration effect operates by creating a sense of debt owed to one’s collaborator.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061758936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061758936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41562-019-0530-9

DO - 10.1038/s41562-019-0530-9

M3 - Letter

VL - 3

SP - 354

EP - 360

JO - Nature Human Behaviour

JF - Nature Human Behaviour

SN - 2397-3374

IS - 4

ER -