Experimentally elicited productions: Differences and similarities between mixed effects and ANOVA analyses

Matthew Goldrick*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

Abstract

Currently, many experimental studies of speech production use fully counterbalanced designs to examine variation in categorical (e.g, correct/incorrect) or relatively continuous measures (e.g., reaction times, voice onset times). These data present several challenges to ANOVA analyses. Some of these issues are well known to be the speech community; for example, the non-normality of dependent variables such as proportion correct. Others have been less extensively addressed; for example, many speech studies account for participant-but not item-specific contributions to variance. I discuss the opportunities and challenges in using linear mixed effects models to address these issues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number060030
JournalProceedings of Meetings on Acoustics
Volume19
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 19 2013
Event21st International Congress on Acoustics, ICA 2013 - 165th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America - Montreal, QC, Canada
Duration: Jun 2 2013Jun 7 2013

Fingerprint

dependent variables
reaction time
proportion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

@article{b607a61c08e84911bd1cd1888e2b247b,
title = "Experimentally elicited productions: Differences and similarities between mixed effects and ANOVA analyses",
abstract = "Currently, many experimental studies of speech production use fully counterbalanced designs to examine variation in categorical (e.g, correct/incorrect) or relatively continuous measures (e.g., reaction times, voice onset times). These data present several challenges to ANOVA analyses. Some of these issues are well known to be the speech community; for example, the non-normality of dependent variables such as proportion correct. Others have been less extensively addressed; for example, many speech studies account for participant-but not item-specific contributions to variance. I discuss the opportunities and challenges in using linear mixed effects models to address these issues.",
author = "Matthew Goldrick",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1121/1.4793583",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
journal = "Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics",
issn = "1939-800X",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experimentally elicited productions

T2 - Differences and similarities between mixed effects and ANOVA analyses

AU - Goldrick, Matthew

PY - 2013/6/19

Y1 - 2013/6/19

N2 - Currently, many experimental studies of speech production use fully counterbalanced designs to examine variation in categorical (e.g, correct/incorrect) or relatively continuous measures (e.g., reaction times, voice onset times). These data present several challenges to ANOVA analyses. Some of these issues are well known to be the speech community; for example, the non-normality of dependent variables such as proportion correct. Others have been less extensively addressed; for example, many speech studies account for participant-but not item-specific contributions to variance. I discuss the opportunities and challenges in using linear mixed effects models to address these issues.

AB - Currently, many experimental studies of speech production use fully counterbalanced designs to examine variation in categorical (e.g, correct/incorrect) or relatively continuous measures (e.g., reaction times, voice onset times). These data present several challenges to ANOVA analyses. Some of these issues are well known to be the speech community; for example, the non-normality of dependent variables such as proportion correct. Others have been less extensively addressed; for example, many speech studies account for participant-but not item-specific contributions to variance. I discuss the opportunities and challenges in using linear mixed effects models to address these issues.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878986576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878986576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.4793583

DO - 10.1121/1.4793583

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:84878986576

VL - 19

JO - Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics

JF - Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics

SN - 1939-800X

M1 - 060030

ER -