Expert conference on cancer pain assessment and classification--the need for international consensus: working proposals on international standards

Stein Kaasa, Giovanni Apolone, Pål Klepstad, Jon H åvard Loge, Marianne J ensen Hjermstad, Oscar Corli, Florian Strasser, Tarja Heiskanen, Massimo Costantini, Vittorina Zagonel, Mogens Groenvold, Robin Fainsinger, Mark P. Jensen, John T. Farrar, Henry McQuay, Nan E. Rothrock, James Cleary, Catherine Deguines, Augusto Caraceni, European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC)European Association for Palliative Care Research Network (EAPCRN)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

58 Scopus citations

Abstract

An increasing number of cancer patients live longer, and palliative care has become an important part of their treatment. Symptoms are often inadequately assessed and managed. A significant challenge in clinical trials is to control for the variability of the samples being studied. To overcome this problem, classification systems have been developed in order to characterise and stratify patients by grouping them according to major common characteristics. The lack of agreed methods for the assessment and classification of cancer pain has been clearly indicated in clinical trials and in clinical practice and may be one possible explanation for the inadequate treatment of cancer pain. This was the background to an international expert meeting arranged in September 2009 in Milan, Italy. The primary aims were to produce recommendations on how to assess and classify cancer pain and to recommend a strategy for the further development, validation and implementation of an international cancer pain classification and assessment system. The recommendations consisted of two basic working proposals, nine specific working proposals and seven recommendations for the further development of a cancer pain classification system. Examples of specific working proposals were to include pain intensity, pain mechanism, breakthrough pain and psychological distress as the core domains in this classification of cancer pain and to measure pain intensity with a 0-10 numerical rating scale with 'no pain' and 'pain as bad as you can imagine' as anchors. The proposed name for this international standard is Cancer Pain Assessment and Classification System (CPACS).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)281-287
Number of pages7
JournalBMJ supportive & palliative care
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Oncology(nursing)
  • Medical–Surgical

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Expert conference on cancer pain assessment and classification--the need for international consensus: working proposals on international standards'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this