Explaining variation in the use of European litigation strategies: European community law and British gender equality policy

Karen J. Alter, Jeannette Vargas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

126 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Through the examination of one of the most successful cases of a European Community (EC) law litigation strategy, this article develops a general framework for understanding when and how the EC legal system will be successfully used by domestic groups to challenge national policy. The authors show how the European legal system actually shifted the domestic balance of power in favor of equality actors, allowing a previously weak domestic group to influence the United Kingdom's gender equality policy at the height of Conservative Party rule. Expanding beyond the British case, the article develops a series of hypotheses about when the EC legal tool is likely to be used by groups to influence national policy, hypotheses that could account for cross-national variation in the impact of European Court of Justice jurisprudence on domestic policy in areas outside of equality policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)452-482
Number of pages31
JournalComparative Political Studies
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

European Law
equality
legal system
European Community
gender
conservative party
European Court of Justice
domestic policy
Group
balance of power
jurisprudence
examination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{96f4f72a0a0f433ea7b6633af960c13b,
title = "Explaining variation in the use of European litigation strategies: European community law and British gender equality policy",
abstract = "Through the examination of one of the most successful cases of a European Community (EC) law litigation strategy, this article develops a general framework for understanding when and how the EC legal system will be successfully used by domestic groups to challenge national policy. The authors show how the European legal system actually shifted the domestic balance of power in favor of equality actors, allowing a previously weak domestic group to influence the United Kingdom's gender equality policy at the height of Conservative Party rule. Expanding beyond the British case, the article develops a series of hypotheses about when the EC legal tool is likely to be used by groups to influence national policy, hypotheses that could account for cross-national variation in the impact of European Court of Justice jurisprudence on domestic policy in areas outside of equality policy.",
author = "Alter, {Karen J.} and Jeannette Vargas",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0010414000033004002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "452--482",
journal = "Comparative Political Studies",
issn = "0010-4140",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Explaining variation in the use of European litigation strategies : European community law and British gender equality policy. / Alter, Karen J.; Vargas, Jeannette.

In: Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 33, No. 4, 01.01.2000, p. 452-482.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining variation in the use of European litigation strategies

T2 - European community law and British gender equality policy

AU - Alter, Karen J.

AU - Vargas, Jeannette

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Through the examination of one of the most successful cases of a European Community (EC) law litigation strategy, this article develops a general framework for understanding when and how the EC legal system will be successfully used by domestic groups to challenge national policy. The authors show how the European legal system actually shifted the domestic balance of power in favor of equality actors, allowing a previously weak domestic group to influence the United Kingdom's gender equality policy at the height of Conservative Party rule. Expanding beyond the British case, the article develops a series of hypotheses about when the EC legal tool is likely to be used by groups to influence national policy, hypotheses that could account for cross-national variation in the impact of European Court of Justice jurisprudence on domestic policy in areas outside of equality policy.

AB - Through the examination of one of the most successful cases of a European Community (EC) law litigation strategy, this article develops a general framework for understanding when and how the EC legal system will be successfully used by domestic groups to challenge national policy. The authors show how the European legal system actually shifted the domestic balance of power in favor of equality actors, allowing a previously weak domestic group to influence the United Kingdom's gender equality policy at the height of Conservative Party rule. Expanding beyond the British case, the article develops a series of hypotheses about when the EC legal tool is likely to be used by groups to influence national policy, hypotheses that could account for cross-national variation in the impact of European Court of Justice jurisprudence on domestic policy in areas outside of equality policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034374448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034374448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0010414000033004002

DO - 10.1177/0010414000033004002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034374448

VL - 33

SP - 452

EP - 482

JO - Comparative Political Studies

JF - Comparative Political Studies

SN - 0010-4140

IS - 4

ER -