TY - JOUR
T1 - Extended work shifts and neurobehavioral performance in resident-physicians
AU - The Rosters Study Group
AU - Rahman, Shadab A.
AU - Sullivan, Jason P.
AU - Barger, Laura K.
AU - St. Hilaire, Melissa A.
AU - O'Brien, Conor S.
AU - Stone, Katie L.
AU - Phillips, Andrew J.K.
AU - Klerman, Elizabeth B.
AU - Qadri, Salim
AU - Wright, Kenneth P.
AU - Halbower, Ann C.
AU - Segar, Jeffrey L.
AU - McGuire, John K.
AU - Vitiello, Michael V.
AU - de la Iglesia, Horacio O.
AU - Poynter, Sue E.
AU - Yu, Pearl L.
AU - Sanderson, Amy L.
AU - Zee, Phyllis C.
AU - Landrigan, Christopher P.
AU - Czeisler, Charles A.
AU - Lockley, Steven W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/3/1
Y1 - 2021/3/1
N2 - OBJECTIVES: Extended-duration work rosters (EDWRs) with shifts of 241 hours impair performance compared with rapid cycling work rosters (RCWRs) that limit shifts to 16 hours in postgraduate year (PGY) 1 resident-physicians. We examined the impact of a RCWR on PGY 2 and PGY 3 resident-physicians. METHODS: Data from 294 resident-physicians were analyzed from a multicenter clinical trial of 6 US PICUs. Resident-physicians worked 4-week EDWRs with shifts of 241 hours every third or fourth shift, or an RCWR in which most shifts were #16 consecutive hours. Participants completed a daily sleep and work log and the 10-minute Psychomotor Vigilance Task and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale 2 to 5 times per shift approximately once per week as operational demands allowed. RESULTS: Overall, the mean (6 SE) number of attentional failures was significantly higher (P =.01) on the EDWR (6.8 6 1.0) compared with RCWR (2.9 6 0.7). Reaction time and subjective alertness were also significantly higher, by ∼18% and ∼9%, respectively (both P,.0001). These differences were sustained across the 4-week rotation. Moreover, attentional failures were associated with resident-physician-related serious medical errors (SMEs) (P =.04). Although a higher rate of SMEs was observed under the RCWR, after adjusting for workload, RCWR had a protective effect on the rate of SMEs (rate ratio 0.48 [95% confidence interval: 0.30-0.77]). CONCLUSIONS: Performance impairment due to EDWR is improved by limiting shift duration. These data and their correlation with SME rates highlight the impairment of neurobehavioral performance due to extended-duration shifts and have important implications for patient safety.
AB - OBJECTIVES: Extended-duration work rosters (EDWRs) with shifts of 241 hours impair performance compared with rapid cycling work rosters (RCWRs) that limit shifts to 16 hours in postgraduate year (PGY) 1 resident-physicians. We examined the impact of a RCWR on PGY 2 and PGY 3 resident-physicians. METHODS: Data from 294 resident-physicians were analyzed from a multicenter clinical trial of 6 US PICUs. Resident-physicians worked 4-week EDWRs with shifts of 241 hours every third or fourth shift, or an RCWR in which most shifts were #16 consecutive hours. Participants completed a daily sleep and work log and the 10-minute Psychomotor Vigilance Task and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale 2 to 5 times per shift approximately once per week as operational demands allowed. RESULTS: Overall, the mean (6 SE) number of attentional failures was significantly higher (P =.01) on the EDWR (6.8 6 1.0) compared with RCWR (2.9 6 0.7). Reaction time and subjective alertness were also significantly higher, by ∼18% and ∼9%, respectively (both P,.0001). These differences were sustained across the 4-week rotation. Moreover, attentional failures were associated with resident-physician-related serious medical errors (SMEs) (P =.04). Although a higher rate of SMEs was observed under the RCWR, after adjusting for workload, RCWR had a protective effect on the rate of SMEs (rate ratio 0.48 [95% confidence interval: 0.30-0.77]). CONCLUSIONS: Performance impairment due to EDWR is improved by limiting shift duration. These data and their correlation with SME rates highlight the impairment of neurobehavioral performance due to extended-duration shifts and have important implications for patient safety.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102538410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102538410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1542/PEDS.2020-009936
DO - 10.1542/PEDS.2020-009936
M3 - Article
C2 - 33619044
AN - SCOPUS:85102538410
SN - 0031-4005
VL - 147
JO - Pediatrics
JF - Pediatrics
IS - 3
M1 - e2020009936
ER -