Extending the boundaries and definition of the ghetto

Mary E Pattillo*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While William Julius Wilson and I both write about 'ghettos', the places and people we study are not the same. Wilson's 'ghettos' are places of concentrated poverty with high rates of joblessness. My definition includes such places and adds working- and middle-class black neighbourhoods as well. I argue that my usage of the term as the entirety of the spatially segregated and contiguous black community is more historically faithful and analytically powerful. Also, it is the configuration that Wilson employs when analysing ghettos of the past, but from which he departs when examining present-day ghettos. This shift obscures important facets of life in the ghetto of both historical periods: namely that 1) the World War II-era ghetto featured internal spatial stratification that divided poor from wealthier blacks, and 2) there remains socio-economic heterogeneity within contemporary segregated black communities as well as patterns of blocked mobility that perpetuate their ghetto status.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1046-1057
Number of pages12
JournalEthnic and Racial Studies
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2003

Fingerprint

ghetto
working class
World War II
community
middle class
poverty
present
economics

Keywords

  • Black middle class
  • Chicago
  • Concentrated poverty
  • Ghetto
  • Racial segregation
  • William Julius Wilson

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{a911e5c10f824c3fbd75250abb8990f6,
title = "Extending the boundaries and definition of the ghetto",
abstract = "While William Julius Wilson and I both write about 'ghettos', the places and people we study are not the same. Wilson's 'ghettos' are places of concentrated poverty with high rates of joblessness. My definition includes such places and adds working- and middle-class black neighbourhoods as well. I argue that my usage of the term as the entirety of the spatially segregated and contiguous black community is more historically faithful and analytically powerful. Also, it is the configuration that Wilson employs when analysing ghettos of the past, but from which he departs when examining present-day ghettos. This shift obscures important facets of life in the ghetto of both historical periods: namely that 1) the World War II-era ghetto featured internal spatial stratification that divided poor from wealthier blacks, and 2) there remains socio-economic heterogeneity within contemporary segregated black communities as well as patterns of blocked mobility that perpetuate their ghetto status.",
keywords = "Black middle class, Chicago, Concentrated poverty, Ghetto, Racial segregation, William Julius Wilson",
author = "Pattillo, {Mary E}",
year = "2003",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/0141987032000132487",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "1046--1057",
journal = "Ethnic and Racial Studies",
issn = "0141-9870",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

Extending the boundaries and definition of the ghetto. / Pattillo, Mary E.

In: Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 26, No. 6, 01.11.2003, p. 1046-1057.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Extending the boundaries and definition of the ghetto

AU - Pattillo, Mary E

PY - 2003/11/1

Y1 - 2003/11/1

N2 - While William Julius Wilson and I both write about 'ghettos', the places and people we study are not the same. Wilson's 'ghettos' are places of concentrated poverty with high rates of joblessness. My definition includes such places and adds working- and middle-class black neighbourhoods as well. I argue that my usage of the term as the entirety of the spatially segregated and contiguous black community is more historically faithful and analytically powerful. Also, it is the configuration that Wilson employs when analysing ghettos of the past, but from which he departs when examining present-day ghettos. This shift obscures important facets of life in the ghetto of both historical periods: namely that 1) the World War II-era ghetto featured internal spatial stratification that divided poor from wealthier blacks, and 2) there remains socio-economic heterogeneity within contemporary segregated black communities as well as patterns of blocked mobility that perpetuate their ghetto status.

AB - While William Julius Wilson and I both write about 'ghettos', the places and people we study are not the same. Wilson's 'ghettos' are places of concentrated poverty with high rates of joblessness. My definition includes such places and adds working- and middle-class black neighbourhoods as well. I argue that my usage of the term as the entirety of the spatially segregated and contiguous black community is more historically faithful and analytically powerful. Also, it is the configuration that Wilson employs when analysing ghettos of the past, but from which he departs when examining present-day ghettos. This shift obscures important facets of life in the ghetto of both historical periods: namely that 1) the World War II-era ghetto featured internal spatial stratification that divided poor from wealthier blacks, and 2) there remains socio-economic heterogeneity within contemporary segregated black communities as well as patterns of blocked mobility that perpetuate their ghetto status.

KW - Black middle class

KW - Chicago

KW - Concentrated poverty

KW - Ghetto

KW - Racial segregation

KW - William Julius Wilson

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344035565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0344035565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0141987032000132487

DO - 10.1080/0141987032000132487

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 1046

EP - 1057

JO - Ethnic and Racial Studies

JF - Ethnic and Racial Studies

SN - 0141-9870

IS - 6

ER -