TY - JOUR
T1 - Extent, nature and consequences of performing outside scope of training in global health
AU - Doobay-Persaud, Ashti
AU - Evert, Jessica
AU - DeCamp, Matthew
AU - Evans, Charlesnika T.
AU - Jacobsen, Kathryn H.
AU - Sheneman, Natalie E.
AU - Goldstein, Joshua L.
AU - Nelson, Brett D.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the Consortium of Universities for Global Health (CUGH) Research and Education Committees, Mark Adler, Laurel Gabler, Adeolu Ilesanmi, and Phuoc Le.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s).
PY - 2019/11/1
Y1 - 2019/11/1
N2 - Background: Globalization has made it possible for global health professionals and trainees to participate in short-term training and professional experiences in a variety of clinical- and non-clinical activities across borders. Consequently, greater numbers of healthcare professionals and trainees from high-income countries (HICs) are working or volunteering abroad and participating in short-term experiences in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). How effective these activities are in advancing global health and in addressing the crisis of human resources for health remains controversial. What is known, however, is that during these short-term experiences in global health (STEGH), health professionals and those in training often face substantive ethical challenges. A common dilemma described is that of acting outside of one's scope of training. However, the frequency, nature, circumstances, and consequences of performing outside scope of training (POST) have not been well-explored or quantified. Methods: The authors conducted an online survey of HIC health professionals and trainees working or volunteering in LMICs about their experiences with POST, within the last 5 years. Results: A total of 223 survey responses were included in the final analysis. Half (49%) of respondents reported having been asked to perform outside their scope of training; of these, 61% reported POST. Trainees were nearly twice as likely as licensed professionals to report POST. Common reasons cited for POST were a mismatch of skills with host expectations, suboptimal supervision at host sites, inadequate preparation to decline POST, a perceived lack of alternative options and emergency situations. Many of the respondents who reported POST expressed moral distress that persisted over time. Conclusions: Given that POST is ethically problematic and legally impermissible, the high rates of being asked, and deciding to do so, were notable. Based on these findings, the authors suggest that additional efforts are needed to reduce the incidence of POST during STEGH, including pre-departure training to navigate dilemmas concerning POST, clear communication regarding expectations, and greater attention to the moral distress experienced by those contending with POST.
AB - Background: Globalization has made it possible for global health professionals and trainees to participate in short-term training and professional experiences in a variety of clinical- and non-clinical activities across borders. Consequently, greater numbers of healthcare professionals and trainees from high-income countries (HICs) are working or volunteering abroad and participating in short-term experiences in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). How effective these activities are in advancing global health and in addressing the crisis of human resources for health remains controversial. What is known, however, is that during these short-term experiences in global health (STEGH), health professionals and those in training often face substantive ethical challenges. A common dilemma described is that of acting outside of one's scope of training. However, the frequency, nature, circumstances, and consequences of performing outside scope of training (POST) have not been well-explored or quantified. Methods: The authors conducted an online survey of HIC health professionals and trainees working or volunteering in LMICs about their experiences with POST, within the last 5 years. Results: A total of 223 survey responses were included in the final analysis. Half (49%) of respondents reported having been asked to perform outside their scope of training; of these, 61% reported POST. Trainees were nearly twice as likely as licensed professionals to report POST. Common reasons cited for POST were a mismatch of skills with host expectations, suboptimal supervision at host sites, inadequate preparation to decline POST, a perceived lack of alternative options and emergency situations. Many of the respondents who reported POST expressed moral distress that persisted over time. Conclusions: Given that POST is ethically problematic and legally impermissible, the high rates of being asked, and deciding to do so, were notable. Based on these findings, the authors suggest that additional efforts are needed to reduce the incidence of POST during STEGH, including pre-departure training to navigate dilemmas concerning POST, clear communication regarding expectations, and greater attention to the moral distress experienced by those contending with POST.
KW - Ethics
KW - Global health
KW - Medical education
KW - Professionalism
KW - Scope of practice
KW - Scope of training
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074494615&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074494615&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12992-019-0506-6
DO - 10.1186/s12992-019-0506-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 31675976
AN - SCOPUS:85074494615
SN - 1744-8603
VL - 15
JO - Globalization and Health
JF - Globalization and Health
IS - 1
M1 - 60
ER -