Factor structure of the Ruminative Responses Scale

A community-sample study

James W Griffith, Filip Raes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The 10-item Ruminative Responses Scale is used to measure two facets of rumination: brooding and reflection. These subscales are used to seek differential correlations with other variables of interest (e.g., depression). The validity of these facets, however, is questionable because brooding and reflection were distinguished based on factor analyses, but subsequent analyses have been inconsistent. We investigated these facets using factor analyses in a large community-based sample (N = 625). Other measures of rumination and depression were used as criteria for validity analyses. Only the brooding items formed a robust scale. A consistent reflection factor did not emerge. Brooding showed convergent validity with other measures of rumination as well as depression, all rs > .4. Brooding was also higher among participants with a history of depression compared with never-depressed participants. Implications for the interpretation of past research and for conducting future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)247-253
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Psychological Assessment
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

Statistical Factor Analysis
Research

Keywords

  • Brooding
  • Reflection
  • RRS
  • Rumination
  • Ruminative Responses Scale

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

@article{cf32b38ce2ad4cc1acbe5199e40070ec,
title = "Factor structure of the Ruminative Responses Scale: A community-sample study",
abstract = "The 10-item Ruminative Responses Scale is used to measure two facets of rumination: brooding and reflection. These subscales are used to seek differential correlations with other variables of interest (e.g., depression). The validity of these facets, however, is questionable because brooding and reflection were distinguished based on factor analyses, but subsequent analyses have been inconsistent. We investigated these facets using factor analyses in a large community-based sample (N = 625). Other measures of rumination and depression were used as criteria for validity analyses. Only the brooding items formed a robust scale. A consistent reflection factor did not emerge. Brooding showed convergent validity with other measures of rumination as well as depression, all rs > .4. Brooding was also higher among participants with a history of depression compared with never-depressed participants. Implications for the interpretation of past research and for conducting future research are discussed.",
keywords = "Brooding, Reflection, RRS, Rumination, Ruminative Responses Scale",
author = "Griffith, {James W} and Filip Raes",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1027/1015-5759/a000231",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "247--253",
journal = "European Journal of Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1015-5759",
publisher = "Hogrefe Publishing",
number = "4",

}

Factor structure of the Ruminative Responses Scale : A community-sample study. / Griffith, James W; Raes, Filip.

In: European Journal of Psychological Assessment, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.10.2015, p. 247-253.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factor structure of the Ruminative Responses Scale

T2 - A community-sample study

AU - Griffith, James W

AU - Raes, Filip

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - The 10-item Ruminative Responses Scale is used to measure two facets of rumination: brooding and reflection. These subscales are used to seek differential correlations with other variables of interest (e.g., depression). The validity of these facets, however, is questionable because brooding and reflection were distinguished based on factor analyses, but subsequent analyses have been inconsistent. We investigated these facets using factor analyses in a large community-based sample (N = 625). Other measures of rumination and depression were used as criteria for validity analyses. Only the brooding items formed a robust scale. A consistent reflection factor did not emerge. Brooding showed convergent validity with other measures of rumination as well as depression, all rs > .4. Brooding was also higher among participants with a history of depression compared with never-depressed participants. Implications for the interpretation of past research and for conducting future research are discussed.

AB - The 10-item Ruminative Responses Scale is used to measure two facets of rumination: brooding and reflection. These subscales are used to seek differential correlations with other variables of interest (e.g., depression). The validity of these facets, however, is questionable because brooding and reflection were distinguished based on factor analyses, but subsequent analyses have been inconsistent. We investigated these facets using factor analyses in a large community-based sample (N = 625). Other measures of rumination and depression were used as criteria for validity analyses. Only the brooding items formed a robust scale. A consistent reflection factor did not emerge. Brooding showed convergent validity with other measures of rumination as well as depression, all rs > .4. Brooding was also higher among participants with a history of depression compared with never-depressed participants. Implications for the interpretation of past research and for conducting future research are discussed.

KW - Brooding

KW - Reflection

KW - RRS

KW - Rumination

KW - Ruminative Responses Scale

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951065405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84951065405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1027/1015-5759/a000231

DO - 10.1027/1015-5759/a000231

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 247

EP - 253

JO - European Journal of Psychological Assessment

JF - European Journal of Psychological Assessment

SN - 1015-5759

IS - 4

ER -