Factors associated with different patterns of nonadherence to HIV care in dar es salaam, Tanzania

Gabriela Poles, Michelle Li, Hellen Siril, Aisa Mhalu, Claudia Hawkins, Sylvia Kaaya, Eric Aris, Guerino Chalamilla, Lisa R. Hirschhorn*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Health system responsiveness (HSR), a measure of patient health care experience, may influence adherence to HIV/AIDS care and be an important predictor of outcomes. We studied the relationship between HSR, patient factors, and visit nonadherence in 16 President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief-supported HIV/AIDS clinics in Dar es Salaam. An HSR survey was administered in 2009, and all clinic visits 1 year following the interviews were analyzed for 720 patients on antiretrovirals (ARVs). Definitions of visit nonadherence were (1) low visit constancy ([VC], no visit in ≥1 quarter), (2) gaps in care (>60 days between visits), (3) no visit in last quarter (VLQ). The relationships between factors were analyzed using multivariate analysis with adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) reported. Few patients were nonadherent using VLQ (14%) and VC (28%). Gaps in care were more common (49.6%) and associated with younger age (AOR: 3.86 [2.02-7.40]), no explanation of side effects (AOR: 2.21 [1.49-3.28]), and shorter antiretroviral therapy (ART) duration (0-3 months AOR: 1.49 [1.09-2.03]; 3-6 months AOR: 2.44 [1.40-4.25]). No VLQ was associated with younger age (AOR: 3.40 [1.63-7.07]), poor health care worker (HCW) communication (AOR: 4.83 [1.39-16.78]), and less time on ART (0-3 months AOR: 5.04 [2.47-10.30]; 3-6 months AOR: 3.09 [1.72-5.57]). Younger age, poor HCW communication, and shorter ART duration also predicted lower VC, as did higher patient-HCW ratios. The rates of visit nonadherence differed based on the definitions used. Younger age, shorter time on ART, and poor HCW communication predicted lower adherence regardless of the definition. More work is needed to understand the relationship between HSR, patient factors, and different patterns of visit nonadherence and their impact on ART outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)78-84
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2014

Funding

The authors would like to thank the clinic’s patients, staff, site managers, and supervisors of all the sites that participated in this study, Harvard University Center for AIDS Research (CFAR), which supported and funded the study through National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded program (P30AI060354), as well as the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation to Harvard University to fund Clinical Research Fellow Gabriela Poles. This publication’s contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the aforementioned organizations. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Harvard University Center for AIDS Research (CFAR) supported and funded the study through National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded program (P30AI060354), as well as the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation to Harvard University funded Clinical Research Fellow Gabriela Poles.

Keywords

  • HIV/AIDS
  • adherence
  • health systems responsiveness
  • patient satisfaction
  • resource-limited settings

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Dermatology
  • Immunology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Factors associated with different patterns of nonadherence to HIV care in dar es salaam, Tanzania'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this