TY - JOUR
T1 - Faculty Assessment of Emergency Medicine Resident Grit
T2 - A Multicenter Study
AU - the Emergency Medicine Education Research Alliance (EMERA)
AU - Olson, Nathan
AU - Olson, Adriana Segura
AU - Williamson, Kelly
AU - Hartman, Nicholas
AU - Branzetti, Jeremy
AU - Lank, Patrick
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
PY - 2019/1
Y1 - 2019/1
N2 - Background: Assessment of trainees’ competency is challenging; the predictive power of traditional evaluations is debatable especially in regard to noncognitive traits. New assessments need to be sought to better understand affective areas like personality. Grit, defined as “perseverance and passion for long-term goals,” can assess aspects of personality. Grit predicts educational attainment and burnout rates in other populations and is accurate with an informant report version. Self-assessments, while useful, have inherent limitations. Faculty's ability to accurately assess trainees’ grit could prove helpful in identifying learner needs and avenues for further development. Objective: This study sought to determine the correlation between EM resident self-assessed and faculty-assessed Grit Scale (Grit-S) scores of that same resident. Methods: Subjects were PGY-1 to -4 EM residents and resident-selected faculty as part of a larger multicenter trial involving 10 EM residencies during 2017. The Grit-S Scale was administered to participating EM residents; an informant version was completed by their self-selected faculty. Correlation coefficients were computed to assess the relationship between residents’ self-assessed and the residents’ faculty-assessed Grit-S score. Results: A total of 281 of 303 residents completed the Grit-S, for a 93% response rate; 200 of 281 residents had at least one faculty-assessed Grit-S score. No correlation was found between residents’ self-assessed and faculty-assessed Grit-S scores. There was a correlation between the two faculty-assessed Grit-S scores for the same resident. Conclusion: There was no correlation between resident and faculty-assessed Grit-S scores; additionally, faculty-assessed Grit-S scores of residents were higher. This corroborates the challenges faculty face at accurately assessing aspects of residents they supervise. While faculty and resident Grit-S scores did not show significant concordance, grit may still be a useful predictive personality trait that could help shape future training.
AB - Background: Assessment of trainees’ competency is challenging; the predictive power of traditional evaluations is debatable especially in regard to noncognitive traits. New assessments need to be sought to better understand affective areas like personality. Grit, defined as “perseverance and passion for long-term goals,” can assess aspects of personality. Grit predicts educational attainment and burnout rates in other populations and is accurate with an informant report version. Self-assessments, while useful, have inherent limitations. Faculty's ability to accurately assess trainees’ grit could prove helpful in identifying learner needs and avenues for further development. Objective: This study sought to determine the correlation between EM resident self-assessed and faculty-assessed Grit Scale (Grit-S) scores of that same resident. Methods: Subjects were PGY-1 to -4 EM residents and resident-selected faculty as part of a larger multicenter trial involving 10 EM residencies during 2017. The Grit-S Scale was administered to participating EM residents; an informant version was completed by their self-selected faculty. Correlation coefficients were computed to assess the relationship between residents’ self-assessed and the residents’ faculty-assessed Grit-S score. Results: A total of 281 of 303 residents completed the Grit-S, for a 93% response rate; 200 of 281 residents had at least one faculty-assessed Grit-S score. No correlation was found between residents’ self-assessed and faculty-assessed Grit-S scores. There was a correlation between the two faculty-assessed Grit-S scores for the same resident. Conclusion: There was no correlation between resident and faculty-assessed Grit-S scores; additionally, faculty-assessed Grit-S scores of residents were higher. This corroborates the challenges faculty face at accurately assessing aspects of residents they supervise. While faculty and resident Grit-S scores did not show significant concordance, grit may still be a useful predictive personality trait that could help shape future training.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062991394&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062991394&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/aet2.10309
DO - 10.1002/aet2.10309
M3 - Article
C2 - 30680342
AN - SCOPUS:85062991394
SN - 2472-5390
VL - 3
SP - 6
EP - 13
JO - AEM Education and Training
JF - AEM Education and Training
IS - 1
ER -