Faculty development for simulation programs: Five issues for the future of debriefing training

Adam Cheng; Vincent Grant; Peter Dieckmann; Sonal Arora; Traci Robinson; Walter Eppich

doi:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000090

Faculty development for simulation programs: Five issues for the future of debriefing training

Adam Cheng^*, Vincent Grant, Peter Dieckmann, Sonal Arora, Traci Robinson, Walter Eppich

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

122 Scopus citations

Abstract

Summary Statement Debriefing is widely recognized as a critically important element of simulation-based education. Simulation educators obtain and/or seek debriefing training from various sources, including workshops at conferences, simulation educator courses, formal fellowships in debriefings, or through advanced degrees. Although there are many options available for debriefing training, little is known about how faculty development opportunities should be structured to maintain and enhance the quality of debriefing within simulation programs.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	217-222
Number of pages	6
Journal	Simulation in Healthcare
Volume	10
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000090
State	Published - Aug 18 2015

Keywords

Debriefing
Education
Faculty Development
Simulation
Training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Epidemiology
Medicine (miscellaneous)
Education
Modeling and Simulation

Access to Document

10.1097/SIH.0000000000000090

Cite this

@article{f9ce6a86c5e24d569cfde0112e51987a,

title = "Faculty development for simulation programs: Five issues for the future of debriefing training",

abstract = "Summary Statement Debriefing is widely recognized as a critically important element of simulation-based education. Simulation educators obtain and/or seek debriefing training from various sources, including workshops at conferences, simulation educator courses, formal fellowships in debriefings, or through advanced degrees. Although there are many options available for debriefing training, little is known about how faculty development opportunities should be structured to maintain and enhance the quality of debriefing within simulation programs.",

keywords = "Debriefing, Education, Faculty Development, Simulation, Training",

author = "Adam Cheng and Vincent Grant and Peter Dieckmann and Sonal Arora and Traci Robinson and Walter Eppich",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2015 by the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.",

year = "2015",

month = aug,

day = "18",

doi = "10.1097/SIH.0000000000000090",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "10",

pages = "217--222",

journal = "Simulation in Healthcare",

issn = "1559-2332",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Faculty development for simulation programs

T2 - Five issues for the future of debriefing training

AU - Cheng, Adam

AU - Grant, Vincent

AU - Dieckmann, Peter

AU - Arora, Sonal

AU - Robinson, Traci

AU - Eppich, Walter

PY - 2015/8/18

Y1 - 2015/8/18

N2 - Summary Statement Debriefing is widely recognized as a critically important element of simulation-based education. Simulation educators obtain and/or seek debriefing training from various sources, including workshops at conferences, simulation educator courses, formal fellowships in debriefings, or through advanced degrees. Although there are many options available for debriefing training, little is known about how faculty development opportunities should be structured to maintain and enhance the quality of debriefing within simulation programs.

AB - Summary Statement Debriefing is widely recognized as a critically important element of simulation-based education. Simulation educators obtain and/or seek debriefing training from various sources, including workshops at conferences, simulation educator courses, formal fellowships in debriefings, or through advanced degrees. Although there are many options available for debriefing training, little is known about how faculty development opportunities should be structured to maintain and enhance the quality of debriefing within simulation programs.

KW - Debriefing

KW - Education

KW - Faculty Development

KW - Simulation

KW - Training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939547264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939547264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000090

DO - 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000090

M3 - Article

C2 - 26098492

AN - SCOPUS:84939547264

SN - 1559-2332

VL - 10

SP - 217

EP - 222

JO - Simulation in Healthcare

JF - Simulation in Healthcare

IS - 4

ER -

Faculty development for simulation programs: Five issues for the future of debriefing training

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this