“Failure is just another try”: Re-framing failure in school through the FUSE studio approach

Jaakko Hilppö*, Reed Stevens

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In an era of high-stakes testing and performance demands that regulate future educational opportunities and affect how schools are managed and funded, failure can easily become stigmatized in the practices of schooling. In turn, it can lead students to avoid activities in which they can be evaluated as failing. As researchers, if we wish to help students recognize the value of failure in the process of learning and to capitalize on failures as significant learning opportunities, we must find ways in which failure at school can be reframed as something productive, rather than punitive. In this study, we investigated how student experience in a FUSE Studio—an alternative infrastructure for learning in schools organized around principles of student choice and interest (Stevens et al., 2016)— support a different, more productive ‘use’ of failure. Our study is an investigation of how failure was framed in the FUSE Studio by students and teachers and whether these participants recognized learning from failure as a productive part of their FUSE Studio experience. Our analysis, which was based on a year-long video ethnography conducted in a typical FUSE Studio, revealed two distinct ways in which failure was framed. In addition, an analysis of participant interviews highlighted that the students and a facilitator viewed failure as a significant and productive part of their FUSE Studio experience. In sum, the study contributes to the existing literature on the value of failure for learning, by highlighting a way that failure can be framed as being productive for both students and teachers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number101494
JournalInternational Journal of Educational Research
Volume99
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

Fingerprint

failure in school
student
learning
school
experience
educational opportunity
teacher
ethnography
Values

Keywords

  • Alternative learning infrastructure
  • Ethnography
  • Failure
  • Interactional analysis
  • Learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

@article{9e3376bef76f47b18632d65d39d6134e,
title = "“Failure is just another try”: Re-framing failure in school through the FUSE studio approach",
abstract = "In an era of high-stakes testing and performance demands that regulate future educational opportunities and affect how schools are managed and funded, failure can easily become stigmatized in the practices of schooling. In turn, it can lead students to avoid activities in which they can be evaluated as failing. As researchers, if we wish to help students recognize the value of failure in the process of learning and to capitalize on failures as significant learning opportunities, we must find ways in which failure at school can be reframed as something productive, rather than punitive. In this study, we investigated how student experience in a FUSE Studio—an alternative infrastructure for learning in schools organized around principles of student choice and interest (Stevens et al., 2016)— support a different, more productive ‘use’ of failure. Our study is an investigation of how failure was framed in the FUSE Studio by students and teachers and whether these participants recognized learning from failure as a productive part of their FUSE Studio experience. Our analysis, which was based on a year-long video ethnography conducted in a typical FUSE Studio, revealed two distinct ways in which failure was framed. In addition, an analysis of participant interviews highlighted that the students and a facilitator viewed failure as a significant and productive part of their FUSE Studio experience. In sum, the study contributes to the existing literature on the value of failure for learning, by highlighting a way that failure can be framed as being productive for both students and teachers.",
keywords = "Alternative learning infrastructure, Ethnography, Failure, Interactional analysis, Learning",
author = "Jaakko Hilpp{\"o} and Reed Stevens",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijer.2019.10.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "99",
journal = "International Journal of Educational Research",
issn = "0883-0355",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Failure is just another try”

T2 - Re-framing failure in school through the FUSE studio approach

AU - Hilppö, Jaakko

AU - Stevens, Reed

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - In an era of high-stakes testing and performance demands that regulate future educational opportunities and affect how schools are managed and funded, failure can easily become stigmatized in the practices of schooling. In turn, it can lead students to avoid activities in which they can be evaluated as failing. As researchers, if we wish to help students recognize the value of failure in the process of learning and to capitalize on failures as significant learning opportunities, we must find ways in which failure at school can be reframed as something productive, rather than punitive. In this study, we investigated how student experience in a FUSE Studio—an alternative infrastructure for learning in schools organized around principles of student choice and interest (Stevens et al., 2016)— support a different, more productive ‘use’ of failure. Our study is an investigation of how failure was framed in the FUSE Studio by students and teachers and whether these participants recognized learning from failure as a productive part of their FUSE Studio experience. Our analysis, which was based on a year-long video ethnography conducted in a typical FUSE Studio, revealed two distinct ways in which failure was framed. In addition, an analysis of participant interviews highlighted that the students and a facilitator viewed failure as a significant and productive part of their FUSE Studio experience. In sum, the study contributes to the existing literature on the value of failure for learning, by highlighting a way that failure can be framed as being productive for both students and teachers.

AB - In an era of high-stakes testing and performance demands that regulate future educational opportunities and affect how schools are managed and funded, failure can easily become stigmatized in the practices of schooling. In turn, it can lead students to avoid activities in which they can be evaluated as failing. As researchers, if we wish to help students recognize the value of failure in the process of learning and to capitalize on failures as significant learning opportunities, we must find ways in which failure at school can be reframed as something productive, rather than punitive. In this study, we investigated how student experience in a FUSE Studio—an alternative infrastructure for learning in schools organized around principles of student choice and interest (Stevens et al., 2016)— support a different, more productive ‘use’ of failure. Our study is an investigation of how failure was framed in the FUSE Studio by students and teachers and whether these participants recognized learning from failure as a productive part of their FUSE Studio experience. Our analysis, which was based on a year-long video ethnography conducted in a typical FUSE Studio, revealed two distinct ways in which failure was framed. In addition, an analysis of participant interviews highlighted that the students and a facilitator viewed failure as a significant and productive part of their FUSE Studio experience. In sum, the study contributes to the existing literature on the value of failure for learning, by highlighting a way that failure can be framed as being productive for both students and teachers.

KW - Alternative learning infrastructure

KW - Ethnography

KW - Failure

KW - Interactional analysis

KW - Learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074894949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074894949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijer.2019.10.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ijer.2019.10.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074894949

VL - 99

JO - International Journal of Educational Research

JF - International Journal of Educational Research

SN - 0883-0355

M1 - 101494

ER -