Fake news and epistemic rot; or, why we are all in this together

Sanford C. Goldberg*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Fake news poses an interesting test case to theories of the epistemology of testimony. If they are to illuminate the nature of the epistemic challenges and harms fake news poses to (members of) a community, the theories themselves must move beyond several overly simplistic models of communication. After developing and criticizing some of these, this chapter goes on to offer a more nearly adequate model. The distinctive feature of the theory presented is that it goes beyond the reporter (speaker) and recipient (hearer), postulating several other roles people (and technology) play in communication. The upshot of these reflections is a case for thinking of epistemic responsibility in distinctly social terms-in terms of what we owe to each other as creatures who are both information-seeking and highly social.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Epistemology of Fake News
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages265-285
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)9780198863977
DOIs
StatePublished - May 20 2021

Keywords

  • Background gardening
  • Epistemic harm
  • Fake news
  • Monitoring
  • Responsible news consumer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Arts and Humanities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fake news and epistemic rot; or, why we are all in this together'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this