TY - JOUR
T1 - False-positive rate of AKI using consensus creatinine–based criteria
AU - Lin, Jennie
AU - Fernandez, Hilda
AU - Shashaty, Michael G.S.
AU - Negoianu, Dan
AU - Testani, Jeffrey M.
AU - Berns, Jeffrey S.
AU - Parikh, Chirag R.
AU - Perry Wilson, F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 by the American Society of Nephrology.
PY - 2015/10/7
Y1 - 2015/10/7
N2 - Background and objectives Use of small changes in serumcreatinine to diagnose AKI allows for earlier detection but may increase diagnostic false–positive rates because of inherent laboratory and biologic variabilities of creatinine. Design, setting, participants,&measurements We examined serum creatinine measurement characteristics in a prospective observational clinical reference cohort of 2267 adult patientswith AKI by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes creatinine criteria and used these data to create a simulation cohort to model AKI false– positive rates. We simulated up to seven successive blood draws on an equal population of hypothetical patients with unchanging true serum creatinine values. Error terms generated from laboratory and biologic variabilities were added to each simulated patient’s true serum creatinine value to obtain the simulated measured serum creatinine for each blood draw.We determined the proportion of patients who would be erroneously diagnosed with AKI by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes creatinine criteria. Results Within the clinical cohort, 75.0% of patients received four serum creatinine draws within at least one 48- hour period during hospitalization. After four simulated creatinine measurements that accounted for laboratory variability calculated from assay characteristics and 4.4% of biologic variability determined from the clinical cohort and publicly available data, the overall false–positive rate for AKI diagnosis was 8.0% (interquartile range =7.9%–8.1%), whereas patients with true serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dl (representing 21% of the clinical cohort) had a false–positive AKI diagnosis rate of 30.5% (interquartile range =30.1%–30.9%) versus 2.0% (interquartile range =1.9%–2.1%) in patients with true serum creatinine values <1.5 mg/dl (P<0.001). Conclusions Use of small serum creatinine changes to diagnose AKI is limited by high false–positive rates caused by inherent variability of serum creatinine at higher baseline values, potentially misclassifying patients with CKD in AKI studies.
AB - Background and objectives Use of small changes in serumcreatinine to diagnose AKI allows for earlier detection but may increase diagnostic false–positive rates because of inherent laboratory and biologic variabilities of creatinine. Design, setting, participants,&measurements We examined serum creatinine measurement characteristics in a prospective observational clinical reference cohort of 2267 adult patientswith AKI by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes creatinine criteria and used these data to create a simulation cohort to model AKI false– positive rates. We simulated up to seven successive blood draws on an equal population of hypothetical patients with unchanging true serum creatinine values. Error terms generated from laboratory and biologic variabilities were added to each simulated patient’s true serum creatinine value to obtain the simulated measured serum creatinine for each blood draw.We determined the proportion of patients who would be erroneously diagnosed with AKI by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes creatinine criteria. Results Within the clinical cohort, 75.0% of patients received four serum creatinine draws within at least one 48- hour period during hospitalization. After four simulated creatinine measurements that accounted for laboratory variability calculated from assay characteristics and 4.4% of biologic variability determined from the clinical cohort and publicly available data, the overall false–positive rate for AKI diagnosis was 8.0% (interquartile range =7.9%–8.1%), whereas patients with true serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dl (representing 21% of the clinical cohort) had a false–positive AKI diagnosis rate of 30.5% (interquartile range =30.1%–30.9%) versus 2.0% (interquartile range =1.9%–2.1%) in patients with true serum creatinine values <1.5 mg/dl (P<0.001). Conclusions Use of small serum creatinine changes to diagnose AKI is limited by high false–positive rates caused by inherent variability of serum creatinine at higher baseline values, potentially misclassifying patients with CKD in AKI studies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943812215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943812215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2215/CJN.02430315
DO - 10.2215/CJN.02430315
M3 - Article
C2 - 26336912
AN - SCOPUS:84943812215
SN - 1555-9041
VL - 10
SP - 1723
EP - 1731
JO - Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN
JF - Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN
IS - 10
ER -