Abstract
Family Law litigant dissatisfaction with psychological evaluations during high-conflict cases is common and can activate litigants to file ethics complaints or malpractice lawsuits. The most critical aspects of a standardized evaluation protocol that lead to litigants believing that they have been fairly and thoroughly evaluated are discussed specifically.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 101-111 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 5 2007 |
Keywords
- Clinical judgment
- Evaluation process
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Applied Psychology