Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of a tabletbased remote data collection method for measuring preference for hearing aid signal processing features. Method: Participants were nine individuals with bilateral mild to moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss. Stimuli were spatialized low-context sentences mixed with six-talker babble at two realistic signal-to-noise ratios (3 and 8 dB) and processed through a hearing aid simulator. Preference for full factorial combinations of three common hearing aid processing features (two levels each) was elicited using a paired-comparison task. Participants completed two versions of the experiment: The lab version was completed in a sound-treated booth using a custom MATLAB application on a desktop computer; the remote version was completed in a quiet room in the participant’s home, using a custom MATLAB executable application on a tablet. Both versions used the same calibrated headphones. Strict infection control protocols were followed. Results: McNemar’s test showed no association between preference and data collection method for the majority of the conditions. Percentage agreement and kappa scores were moderate/fair across most conditions. The results indicated that the remote versus lab versions did not have a systematic effect on preference. However, the relatively low agreement and kappa scores suggested within-subject variability in the outcome (preference). Conclusion: The tablet-based version of remote experimentation was comparable to the lab-based version for eliciting preference for hearing aid signal processing features.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 746-756 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | American Journal of Audiology |
Volume | 31 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - Sep 2022 |
Funding
This work was supported by the American Speech and Hearing Foundation New Investigators Grant (awarded to V.R.). Portions of this work were presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 2021 Convention. The authors thank Jacob Schauer for assistance with statistical analysis, and Kendra Marks and Magda Wisniewska for assistance with data collection.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine