Feasibility, sensitivity, and specificity of postprocedure peritoneal cytology

Brandon Luke L Seagle, Melissa Dawson, Robert Samuelson, Mary S. Chacho, Thomas J. Rutherford, Shohreh Shahabi*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility and diagnostic performance of cytopathologic evaluation of postprocedure washings collected after hysterectomy for gynecologic cancer. A total of 92 cases of hysterectomy for malignancy having cytology reports of both pre- and postprocedure washings were retrospectively identified. In all, 98.7% of preprocedure and 99.3% of postprocedure washings (P = 1.00) were satisfactory for cytopathology. Discordance regarding the observation of malignant cells between preprocedure and postprocedure washings was insignificant (P =.267). The sensitivity of postprocedure cytology for detecting malignant cells in cases of positive peritoneal histology was significantly lower than the sensitivity of preprocedure cytology (28.6% vs 57.1%, P =.041), with similar specificities (both 94%). Four patients with endometrial cancer having negative preprocedure peritoneal cytology were discovered to have positive postprocedure cytology. Postprocedure peritoneal cytology is feasible and may benefit patients with early-stage cancer by increasing the detection of microscopic peritoneal metastasis or cancer cell seeding during surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)808-813
Number of pages6
JournalReproductive Sciences
Volume22
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 3 2015

Keywords

  • cancer
  • cytology
  • postoperative

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Feasibility, sensitivity, and specificity of postprocedure peritoneal cytology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this