TY - JOUR
T1 - Feasibility study of microburst VNS therapy in drug-resistant focal and generalized epilepsy
AU - The Microburst Study Group
AU - Drees, Cornelia
AU - Afra, Pegah
AU - Verner, Ryan
AU - Kaye, Lesley
AU - Keith, Amy
AU - Jiang, Mei
AU - Szaflarski, Jerzy P.
AU - Nichol, Kathryn
AU - McDermott, Danielle
AU - Brown, Mesha Gay
AU - Macken, Michael
AU - Bellinski, Irena
AU - Cunningham, Elizabeth
AU - O'Dwyer, Rebecca
AU - Lynn, Fiona
AU - Tatum, William O.
AU - Benbadis, Selim R.
AU - Jaisani, Zeenat
AU - Zafar, Muhammad
AU - Newman, Blake
AU - Aydemir, Seyhmus
AU - Vonck, Kristl
AU - Mertens, Ann
AU - Allendorfer, Jane
AU - Gordon, Charles
AU - Begnaud, Jason
AU - Shamshiri, Elhum
AU - Fetzer, Steffen
AU - Ranuzzi, Giovanni
AU - Giannicola, Gaia
AU - Van Grunderbeek, Wim
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/3/1
Y1 - 2024/3/1
N2 - Background: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) at low frequencies (≤30 Hz) has been an established treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) for over 25 years. Objective: To examine the initial safety and efficacy performance of an investigational, high-frequency (≥250 Hz) VNS paradigm herein called “Microburst VNS” (μVNS). μVNS consists of short, high-frequency bursts of electrical pulses believed to preferentially modulate certain brain regions. Methods: Thirty-three (33) participants were enrolled into an exploratory feasibility study, 21 with focal-onset seizures and 12 with generalized-onset seizures. Participants were titrated to a personalized target dose of μVNS using an investigational fMRI protocol. Participants were then followed for up to 12 months, with visits every 3 months, and monitored for side-effects at all time points. This study was registered as NCT03446664 on February 27th, 2018. Results: The device was well-tolerated. Reported adverse events were consistent with typical low frequency VNS outcomes and tended to diminish in severity over time, including dysphonia, cough, dyspnea, and implant site pain. After 12 months of μVNS, the mean seizure frequency reduction for all seizures was 61.3% (median reduction: 70.4%; 90% CI of median: 48.9%–83.3%). The 12-month responder rate (≥50% reduction) was 63.3% (90% CI: 46.7%–77.9%) and the super-responder rate (≥80% reduction) was 40% (90% CI: 25.0%–56.6%). Participants with focal-onset seizures appeared to benefit similarly to participants with generalized-onset seizures (mean reduction in seizures at 12 months: 62.6% focal [n = 19], versus 59.0% generalized [n = 11]). Conclusion: Overall, μVNS appears to be safe and potentially a promising therapeutic alternative to traditional VNS. It merits further investigation in randomized controlled trials which will help determine the impact of investigational variables and which patients are most suitable for this novel therapy.
AB - Background: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) at low frequencies (≤30 Hz) has been an established treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) for over 25 years. Objective: To examine the initial safety and efficacy performance of an investigational, high-frequency (≥250 Hz) VNS paradigm herein called “Microburst VNS” (μVNS). μVNS consists of short, high-frequency bursts of electrical pulses believed to preferentially modulate certain brain regions. Methods: Thirty-three (33) participants were enrolled into an exploratory feasibility study, 21 with focal-onset seizures and 12 with generalized-onset seizures. Participants were titrated to a personalized target dose of μVNS using an investigational fMRI protocol. Participants were then followed for up to 12 months, with visits every 3 months, and monitored for side-effects at all time points. This study was registered as NCT03446664 on February 27th, 2018. Results: The device was well-tolerated. Reported adverse events were consistent with typical low frequency VNS outcomes and tended to diminish in severity over time, including dysphonia, cough, dyspnea, and implant site pain. After 12 months of μVNS, the mean seizure frequency reduction for all seizures was 61.3% (median reduction: 70.4%; 90% CI of median: 48.9%–83.3%). The 12-month responder rate (≥50% reduction) was 63.3% (90% CI: 46.7%–77.9%) and the super-responder rate (≥80% reduction) was 40% (90% CI: 25.0%–56.6%). Participants with focal-onset seizures appeared to benefit similarly to participants with generalized-onset seizures (mean reduction in seizures at 12 months: 62.6% focal [n = 19], versus 59.0% generalized [n = 11]). Conclusion: Overall, μVNS appears to be safe and potentially a promising therapeutic alternative to traditional VNS. It merits further investigation in randomized controlled trials which will help determine the impact of investigational variables and which patients are most suitable for this novel therapy.
KW - Drug resistant epilepsy
KW - Feasibility study
KW - Generalized seizures
KW - Titration
KW - Vagus nerve stimulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188898867&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85188898867&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.brs.2024.03.010
DO - 10.1016/j.brs.2024.03.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 38499287
AN - SCOPUS:85188898867
SN - 1935-861X
VL - 17
SP - 382
EP - 391
JO - Brain Stimulation
JF - Brain Stimulation
IS - 2
ER -