Feedback in Medical Education: An Evidence-based Guide to Best Practices from the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine

Sreeja Natesan*, Jaime Jordan, Alexander Sheng, Guy Carmelli, Brian Barbas, Andrew King, Kataryza Gore, Molly Estes, Michael Gottlieb

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Within medical education, feedback is an invaluable tool to facilitate learning and growth throughout a physician’s training and beyond. Despite the importance of feedback, variations in practice indicate the need for evidence-based guidelines to inform best practices. Additionally, time constraints, variable acuity, and workflow in the emergency department (ED) pose unique challenges to providing effective feedback. This paper outlines expert guidelines for feedback in the ED setting from members of the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine Best Practices Subcommittee, based on the best evidence available through a critical review of the literature. We provide guidance on the use of feedback in medical education, with a focus on instructor strategies for giving feedback and learner strategies for receiving feedback, and we offer suggestions for fostering a culture of feedback.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)479-494
Number of pages16
JournalWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

Funding

The authors would like to thank the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine for its support of our committee and this project. The authors also would like to acknowledge Samantha Kaplan, PhD, Medical Librarian, Duke University, Durham, NC, for her contributions.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Feedback in Medical Education: An Evidence-based Guide to Best Practices from the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this