Feeding gastrostomy in neurologically impaired children: Is an antireflux procedure necessary?

Jacob C. Langer, David E. Wesson*, Sigmund H. Ein, Robert M. Filler, Barry Shandling, Riccardo A. Superina, Moshe Papa

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Some authors recommend a routine “protective” antiretlux procedure (ARP) in neurologically impaired children undergoing feeding gastrostomy (FG). Over 4 years, we performed FG in 107 neurologically impaired children aged I month to 16 years. Ninety-eight had preoperative radiological assessment for gastroesophageal reflux (GER), which was documented in 44, of whom 33 had FG plus ARP and II had FG alone. Seven of the 11 subsequently developed symptomatic GER and 5 of them had a secondary ARP. Of the 54 children with no demonstrable GER preoperatively, 3 children underwent FG plus ARP. The remaining 51 had FG alone. There was one postoperative death. Of the 50 surviving patients. 22 developed symptomatic GER and 17 of these had a subsequent ARP. Mean follow-up of 20.0 months showed that the risk of developing GER after FG alone was not influenced by age, sex, indication for FG, underlying diagnosis, or method of gastrostomy. There was no significant difference in mortality and early morbidity between patients undergoing FG alone and those having FG with simultaneous or subsequent ARP. Only 44% of our patients in whom GER was not demonstrated initially developed symptomatic GER followed FG alone. This incidence does not justify a routine “protective” ARP.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)837-841
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Volume7
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1988

Fingerprint

Gastrostomy
Gastroesophageal Reflux

Keywords

  • Antireflux procedure
  • Feeding gastrostomy
  • Fundoplication
  • Gastroesophageal reflux
  • Neurologic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Langer, Jacob C. ; Wesson, David E. ; Ein, Sigmund H. ; Filler, Robert M. ; Shandling, Barry ; Superina, Riccardo A. ; Papa, Moshe. / Feeding gastrostomy in neurologically impaired children : Is an antireflux procedure necessary?. In: Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 1988 ; Vol. 7, No. 6. pp. 837-841.
@article{ab31adf2fd554bc38d2f7dc10296e274,
title = "Feeding gastrostomy in neurologically impaired children: Is an antireflux procedure necessary?",
abstract = "Some authors recommend a routine “protective” antiretlux procedure (ARP) in neurologically impaired children undergoing feeding gastrostomy (FG). Over 4 years, we performed FG in 107 neurologically impaired children aged I month to 16 years. Ninety-eight had preoperative radiological assessment for gastroesophageal reflux (GER), which was documented in 44, of whom 33 had FG plus ARP and II had FG alone. Seven of the 11 subsequently developed symptomatic GER and 5 of them had a secondary ARP. Of the 54 children with no demonstrable GER preoperatively, 3 children underwent FG plus ARP. The remaining 51 had FG alone. There was one postoperative death. Of the 50 surviving patients. 22 developed symptomatic GER and 17 of these had a subsequent ARP. Mean follow-up of 20.0 months showed that the risk of developing GER after FG alone was not influenced by age, sex, indication for FG, underlying diagnosis, or method of gastrostomy. There was no significant difference in mortality and early morbidity between patients undergoing FG alone and those having FG with simultaneous or subsequent ARP. Only 44{\%} of our patients in whom GER was not demonstrated initially developed symptomatic GER followed FG alone. This incidence does not justify a routine “protective” ARP.",
keywords = "Antireflux procedure, Feeding gastrostomy, Fundoplication, Gastroesophageal reflux, Neurologic",
author = "Langer, {Jacob C.} and Wesson, {David E.} and Ein, {Sigmund H.} and Filler, {Robert M.} and Barry Shandling and Superina, {Riccardo A.} and Moshe Papa",
year = "1988",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00005176-198811000-00007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "837--841",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition",
issn = "0277-2116",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

Feeding gastrostomy in neurologically impaired children : Is an antireflux procedure necessary? / Langer, Jacob C.; Wesson, David E.; Ein, Sigmund H.; Filler, Robert M.; Shandling, Barry; Superina, Riccardo A.; Papa, Moshe.

In: Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Vol. 7, No. 6, 01.01.1988, p. 837-841.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feeding gastrostomy in neurologically impaired children

T2 - Is an antireflux procedure necessary?

AU - Langer, Jacob C.

AU - Wesson, David E.

AU - Ein, Sigmund H.

AU - Filler, Robert M.

AU - Shandling, Barry

AU - Superina, Riccardo A.

AU - Papa, Moshe

PY - 1988/1/1

Y1 - 1988/1/1

N2 - Some authors recommend a routine “protective” antiretlux procedure (ARP) in neurologically impaired children undergoing feeding gastrostomy (FG). Over 4 years, we performed FG in 107 neurologically impaired children aged I month to 16 years. Ninety-eight had preoperative radiological assessment for gastroesophageal reflux (GER), which was documented in 44, of whom 33 had FG plus ARP and II had FG alone. Seven of the 11 subsequently developed symptomatic GER and 5 of them had a secondary ARP. Of the 54 children with no demonstrable GER preoperatively, 3 children underwent FG plus ARP. The remaining 51 had FG alone. There was one postoperative death. Of the 50 surviving patients. 22 developed symptomatic GER and 17 of these had a subsequent ARP. Mean follow-up of 20.0 months showed that the risk of developing GER after FG alone was not influenced by age, sex, indication for FG, underlying diagnosis, or method of gastrostomy. There was no significant difference in mortality and early morbidity between patients undergoing FG alone and those having FG with simultaneous or subsequent ARP. Only 44% of our patients in whom GER was not demonstrated initially developed symptomatic GER followed FG alone. This incidence does not justify a routine “protective” ARP.

AB - Some authors recommend a routine “protective” antiretlux procedure (ARP) in neurologically impaired children undergoing feeding gastrostomy (FG). Over 4 years, we performed FG in 107 neurologically impaired children aged I month to 16 years. Ninety-eight had preoperative radiological assessment for gastroesophageal reflux (GER), which was documented in 44, of whom 33 had FG plus ARP and II had FG alone. Seven of the 11 subsequently developed symptomatic GER and 5 of them had a secondary ARP. Of the 54 children with no demonstrable GER preoperatively, 3 children underwent FG plus ARP. The remaining 51 had FG alone. There was one postoperative death. Of the 50 surviving patients. 22 developed symptomatic GER and 17 of these had a subsequent ARP. Mean follow-up of 20.0 months showed that the risk of developing GER after FG alone was not influenced by age, sex, indication for FG, underlying diagnosis, or method of gastrostomy. There was no significant difference in mortality and early morbidity between patients undergoing FG alone and those having FG with simultaneous or subsequent ARP. Only 44% of our patients in whom GER was not demonstrated initially developed symptomatic GER followed FG alone. This incidence does not justify a routine “protective” ARP.

KW - Antireflux procedure

KW - Feeding gastrostomy

KW - Fundoplication

KW - Gastroesophageal reflux

KW - Neurologic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024116611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024116611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005176-198811000-00007

DO - 10.1097/00005176-198811000-00007

M3 - Article

C2 - 3143818

AN - SCOPUS:0024116611

VL - 7

SP - 837

EP - 841

JO - Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

JF - Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

SN - 0277-2116

IS - 6

ER -