Feeding tubes: Three perspectives

Rebecca J Brashler*, Teresa A. Savage, Debjani Mukherjee, Kristi L. Kirschner

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes, or PEC tubes, look innocuous enough - narrow, plastic, pliable tubes, that when inserted into the stomach protrude approximately 3 to 5 inches and can be attached to a bag of liquid food. How can something so seemingly straightforward create so much controversy and evoke such intense emotion? It seems that part of the answer lies in the fact that nobody sees the same thing when they look at a feeding tube. This article will present three different views of gastrostomy tubes and challenge practitioners to think beyond traditional models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)74-77
Number of pages4
JournalTopics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2007

Keywords

  • Decision-making
  • Disability
  • Ethics
  • Feeding tubes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Rehabilitation
  • Community and Home Care
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Feeding tubes: Three perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this