Feeling judged? How the presence of outgroup members promotes healthier food choices

Maferima Touré-Tillery*, Janina Steinmetz, Blake DiCosola

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

The present article examines how the presence of others from a different social group (i.e., outgroup audience) influences consumers' food choices relative to the presence of others from their own social group (i.e., ingroup audience). In four studies, using various types of group memberships (race, university affiliation, and work affiliation), we first find that consumers are more likely to make healthy food choices in the presence of racial (Study 1) and university (Study 2) outgroup (vs. ingroup) audiences. Then, using an experimental causal-chain mediation approach, we show this effect occurs because consumers anticipate more negative judgment from outgroup (vs. ingroup) audiences (Studies 3a and 3b). We discuss the possible role of outgroup contact and diversity in promoting healthy eating.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1504-1510
Number of pages7
JournalPsychology and Marketing
Volume39
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2022

Funding

This study was supported in part by funding from the Richard M. Clewett Endowed Professorship, Kellogg School of Management, awarded to the first author.

Keywords

  • anticipated judgment
  • food choice
  • healthy food
  • impression management
  • intergroup behavior

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Marketing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Feeling judged? How the presence of outgroup members promotes healthier food choices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this