Abstract
Introduction: Knowledge of whether final infarct volume (FIV) predicts disability after mild stroke is limited. We sought to determine if FIV could differentiate good versus poor outcome after mild stroke. Methods: We retrospectively identified 65 patients with mild stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 5) in a multicenter registry of 2453 patients. We evaluated associations between FIV and clinical outcome and evaluated the optimal FIV threshold that discriminated favorable (modified Rankin scale (MRS) 0â€"1) versus poor (MRS 2â€"6) outcome. Results: The FIV cut-point of 20 mL differentiated favorable and poor outcomes (area under curve (AUC) 0.73, 95% confidence interval: 0.58â€"0.88). Favorable outcome was observed in 37/45 (82%) with FIV<20 mL, compared to 5/14 (36%) with FIV20 mL (p<0.01). FIV20 mL remained strongly associated with poor outcome independent of age, gender, stroke severity, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), and proximal arterial occlusion. Conclusion: In our small sample size, an FIV of 20 mL best differentiated between the likelihood of good versus poor outcome in patients with mild stroke. Further validation of infarct volume as a surrogate marker in mild stroke is warranted.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 404-408 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Neuroradiology Journal |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 2015 |
Keywords
- Final infarct volume
- Mild stroke
- Outcome
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Neurology
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging