Final infarct volume discriminates outcome in mild strokes

Achala S. Vagal*, Heidi Sucharew, Shyam Prabhakaran, Pooja Khatri, Tudor Jovin, Patrik Michel, Max Wintermark

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Knowledge of whether final infarct volume (FIV) predicts disability after mild stroke is limited. We sought to determine if FIV could differentiate good versus poor outcome after mild stroke. Methods: We retrospectively identified 65 patients with mild stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 5) in a multicenter registry of 2453 patients. We evaluated associations between FIV and clinical outcome and evaluated the optimal FIV threshold that discriminated favorable (modified Rankin scale (MRS) 0â€"1) versus poor (MRS 2â€"6) outcome. Results: The FIV cut-point of 20 mL differentiated favorable and poor outcomes (area under curve (AUC) 0.73, 95% confidence interval: 0.58â€"0.88). Favorable outcome was observed in 37/45 (82%) with FIV<20 mL, compared to 5/14 (36%) with FIV20 mL (p<0.01). FIV20 mL remained strongly associated with poor outcome independent of age, gender, stroke severity, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), and proximal arterial occlusion. Conclusion: In our small sample size, an FIV of 20 mL best differentiated between the likelihood of good versus poor outcome in patients with mild stroke. Further validation of infarct volume as a surrogate marker in mild stroke is warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)404-408
Number of pages5
JournalNeuroradiology Journal
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2015

Keywords

  • Final infarct volume
  • Mild stroke
  • Outcome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Final infarct volume discriminates outcome in mild strokes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this