TY - JOUR
T1 - Finding needles in a haystack
T2 - A methodology for identifying and sampling community-based youth smoking cessation programs
AU - Emery, Sherry
AU - Lee, Jungwha
AU - Curry, Susan J.
AU - Johnson, Tim
AU - Sporer, Amy K.
AU - Mermelstein, Robin
AU - Flay, Brian
AU - Warnecke, Richard
PY - 2010/2
Y1 - 2010/2
N2 - Background: Surveys of community-based programs are difficult to conduct when there is virtually no information about the number or locations of the programs of interest. This article describes the methodology used by the Helping Young Smokers Quit (HYSQ) initiative to identify and profile community-based youth smoking cessation programs in the absence of a defined sample frame. Methods: We developed a two-stage sampling design, with counties as the first-stage probability sampling units. The second stage used snowball sampling to saturation, to identify individuals who administered youth smoking cessation programs across three economic sectors in each county. Multivariate analyses modeled the relationship between program screening, eligibility, and response rates and economic sector and stratification criteria. Cumulative logit models analyzed the relationship between the number of contacts in a county and the number of programs screened, eligible, or profiled in a county. Results: The snowball process yielded 9,983 unique and traceable contacts. Urban and high-income counties yielded significantly more screened program administrators; urban counties produced significantly more eligible programs, but there was no significant association between the county characteristics and program response rate. There is a positive relationship between the number of informants initially located and the number of programs screened, eligible, and profiled in a county. Discussion: Our strategy to identify youth tobacco cessation programs could be used to create a sample frame for other nonprofit organizations that are difficult to identify due to a lack of existing directories, lists, or other traditional sample frames.
AB - Background: Surveys of community-based programs are difficult to conduct when there is virtually no information about the number or locations of the programs of interest. This article describes the methodology used by the Helping Young Smokers Quit (HYSQ) initiative to identify and profile community-based youth smoking cessation programs in the absence of a defined sample frame. Methods: We developed a two-stage sampling design, with counties as the first-stage probability sampling units. The second stage used snowball sampling to saturation, to identify individuals who administered youth smoking cessation programs across three economic sectors in each county. Multivariate analyses modeled the relationship between program screening, eligibility, and response rates and economic sector and stratification criteria. Cumulative logit models analyzed the relationship between the number of contacts in a county and the number of programs screened, eligible, or profiled in a county. Results: The snowball process yielded 9,983 unique and traceable contacts. Urban and high-income counties yielded significantly more screened program administrators; urban counties produced significantly more eligible programs, but there was no significant association between the county characteristics and program response rate. There is a positive relationship between the number of informants initially located and the number of programs screened, eligible, and profiled in a county. Discussion: Our strategy to identify youth tobacco cessation programs could be used to create a sample frame for other nonprofit organizations that are difficult to identify due to a lack of existing directories, lists, or other traditional sample frames.
KW - Community health promotion programs
KW - Organizational research
KW - Program evaluation
KW - Youth smoking cessation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76249100084&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76249100084&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0193841X09355258
DO - 10.1177/0193841X09355258
M3 - Article
C2 - 20130235
AN - SCOPUS:76249100084
SN - 0193-841X
VL - 34
SP - 35
EP - 51
JO - Evaluation Review
JF - Evaluation Review
IS - 1
ER -