Fingerprint-based background checks for personal care workers: Stakeholder views of policy criteria

Eric D. Raile*, Sarah J. Swierenga, Toni A. Dennis, Lauren A. Swanson-Aprill, Lori A. Post, Fuad Abujarad

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Decision makers face difficult choices when tasked with identifying and implementing appropriate mechanisms for protecting the elderly and other vulnerable adults from abuse. A pilot project involving fingerprint-based criminal history background checks for personal care workers in Michigan has supplied an opportunity to examine one such mechanism. In conjunction with the pilot project, we have conducted a stakeholder analysis with the aim of informing decision makers about stakeholder perceptions of standard policy criteria like effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. We employed focus groups and a Web-based survey to collect data from stakeholders. While stakeholders generally see fingerprint-base background checks for personal care workers as potentially effective and as a net benefit, they also point to a variety of contingencies. They also recognize difficulties and constraints for government involvement. This preliminary analysis provides solid foundational information for decision makers and for more extensive benefit–cost analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)75-92
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Elder Abuse and Neglect
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 24 2018

Keywords

  • Criminal history background checks
  • Elder abuse
  • Long-term care
  • Mixed methods
  • Personal care workers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Fingerprint-based background checks for personal care workers: Stakeholder views of policy criteria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this