Follow-up and Outcomes of Patients With Long-term Cutaneous Vesicostomies at a Single Institution

Katherine M. Fischer*, Diana K. Bowen, R. Caleb Kovell, Douglas A. Canning, Dana A. Weiss

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify and describe the characteristics of a group of patients at our institution who are satisfied with cutaneous vesicostomy for long-term bladder management and never undergo subsequent continence surgery. METHODS: Using an IRB-approved registry of our patients undergoing reconstructive urinary tract surgery since 1985, we identified patients who underwent vesicostomy creation and were 15 years or older as of October 2017 and performed a retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were included with the most common diagnosis being spina bifida and the average duration of vesicostomy 14.3 years (range 8 months to 35 years). In follow-up, 38 patients (56.7%) had conversations regarding further surgery and 31 (46.3%) had their vesicostomies taken down. Of the 36 patients who still had their vesicostomy at last follow-up, 29 (80.6%) had spina bifida and 14 (38.9%) were satisfied, 1 (2.8%) was unhappy, 4 (11.1%) were deceased and satisfaction was unknown for 17 (47.2 %). CONCLUSION: Although often intended to be temporary, in our experience many patients keep their vesicostomy for a long time and into adulthood, with generally high satisfaction and low complications. In the properly selected patient, vesicostomy may be a good long-term operation to prevent infection and renal deterioration, though more rigorous studies of these patients are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)255-260
Number of pages6
JournalUrology
Volume144
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Follow-up and Outcomes of Patients With Long-term Cutaneous Vesicostomies at a Single Institution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this