Framing, resonance, and micro-mobilization: Shall we say what we are for, or what we are against?

Soroush Aslani; Brayden King; Hamid Foroughi

doi:10.5465/AMBPP.2013.163

Framing, resonance, and micro-mobilization: Shall we say what we are for, or what we are against?

Soroush Aslani, Brayden King, Hamid Foroughi

Management and Organizations

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Social movement frames can stress the positive attributions of movement supporters (protagonistic frames) or the negative attributions of movement opponents (antagonistic frames). Our interviews and experiments show that antagonistic frames engaged extreme supporters more than moderate supporters, and that the interaction of antagonism and extreme ideology provoked radical tactics.

Original language	English (US)
Pages	1410-1415
Number of pages	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2013.163
State	Published - 2013
Event	73rd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2013 - Orlando, United States Duration: Aug 10 2013 → Aug 12 2013

Conference

Conference	73rd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2013
Country/Territory	United States
City	Orlando
Period	8/10/13 → 8/12/13

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Management Information Systems
Management of Technology and Innovation
Industrial relations

Access to Document

10.5465/AMBPP.2013.163

Cite this

@conference{a60b7312441e4a55af399e5f0996a3d6,

title = "Framing, resonance, and micro-mobilization: Shall we say what we are for, or what we are against?",

abstract = "Social movement frames can stress the positive attributions of movement supporters (protagonistic frames) or the negative attributions of movement opponents (antagonistic frames). Our interviews and experiments show that antagonistic frames engaged extreme supporters more than moderate supporters, and that the interaction of antagonism and extreme ideology provoked radical tactics.",

author = "Soroush Aslani and Brayden King and Hamid Foroughi",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.5465/AMBPP.2013.163",

language = "English (US)",

pages = "1410--1415",

note = "73rd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2013 ; Conference date: 10-08-2013 Through 12-08-2013",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Framing, resonance, and micro-mobilization

T2 - 73rd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2013

AU - Aslani, Soroush

AU - King, Brayden

AU - Foroughi, Hamid

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Social movement frames can stress the positive attributions of movement supporters (protagonistic frames) or the negative attributions of movement opponents (antagonistic frames). Our interviews and experiments show that antagonistic frames engaged extreme supporters more than moderate supporters, and that the interaction of antagonism and extreme ideology provoked radical tactics.

AB - Social movement frames can stress the positive attributions of movement supporters (protagonistic frames) or the negative attributions of movement opponents (antagonistic frames). Our interviews and experiments show that antagonistic frames engaged extreme supporters more than moderate supporters, and that the interaction of antagonism and extreme ideology provoked radical tactics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026263561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026263561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5465/AMBPP.2013.163

DO - 10.5465/AMBPP.2013.163

M3 - Paper

AN - SCOPUS:85026263561

SP - 1410

EP - 1415

Y2 - 10 August 2013 through 12 August 2013

ER -

Framing, resonance, and micro-mobilization: Shall we say what we are for, or what we are against?

Abstract

Conference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this