Abstract
Purpose: To assess the impact of aortic valve morphology on aortic hemodynamics between normal tricuspid and congenitally anomalous aortic valves ranging from unicuspid to quadricuspid morphology.
Materials and Methods: Aortic three-dimensional (3D) blood flow was evaluated by 4D flow MRI in 14 healthy volunteers with normal trileaflet valves and 14 patients with unicuspid (n = 3), bicuspid (n = 9, 3 "true" bicuspid, 3 right-left (RL), 3 right-noncoronary (RN) leaflet fusion, and quadricuspid aortic valves (n = 2). Data analysis included the co-registered visualization of aortic valve morphology with systolic 3D blood flow. The influence of valve morphology on aortic hemodynamics was quantified by valve flow angle.
Results: All RL-bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) were associated with flow jets directed toward the right anterior aortic wall while RN-fusion and unicuspid valves resulted in flow jet patterns toward the right-posterior or posterior wall. Flow angles were clearly influenced by valve morphology (47° ±10, 28° ±2, 29° ±18, 18° ±12, 15° ±2 for unicuspid, true BAV, RN-BAV, RL-BAV, quadricuspid valves) and increased compared with controls (7.2° ± 1.1, P=0.001).
Conclusion: Altered 3D aortic hemodynamics are impacted by the morphology of congenitally malformed aortic valves.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1342-1346 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
Volume | 40 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 1 2014 |
Keywords
- 4D flow MRI
- Aortic valve
- Bicuspid valve
- Hemodynamics
- Quadricuspid valve
- Unicuspid valve
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging