TY - JOUR
T1 - Functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with brain tumors
T2 - A preliminary report
AU - Huang, Mark E.
AU - Wartella, Jennifer E.
AU - Kreutzer, Jeffery S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by the American Cancer Society (grant no. IN-105) and the Kiwanis Club.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Objectives: To determine the relationship between functional outcome and quality of life (QOL) in patients with brain tumors receiving inpatient rehabilitation, and to assess the sensitivity of 4 assessment tools in measuring changes in that population. Design: Prospective study using longitudinal data collected from consecutively admitted patients. Setting: Acute inpatient rehabilitation unit. Participants: Ten patients with primary brain tumors admitted to an acute inpatient rehabilitation unit. Interventions: Patients participated in an inpatient interdisciplinary rehabilitation program that used the following disciplines: occupational therapy, rehabilitation therapy, recreational therapy, speech therapy, physical therapy, rehabilitation nursing and case management. Main Outcome Measures: The FIM™ instrument, Disability Rating Scale (DRS), Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPS), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Brain (FACT-BR). Results: Improvement in total functional outcome was indicated by all 3 functional measures (FIM: F = 46.84, p <.05; DRS: F = 19.25, p <.05; KPS: F = 10.11, p <.05). Significant improvements were found between admission and discharge scores for the FIM and DRS. The KPS revealed significant improvement between admission and 3-month follow-up scores. All admission and discharge functional scales (FIM, DRS, KPS) correlated significantly with each other. No significant change was noted in the FACT-BR between admission and discharge scores, but FACT-BR scores did improve at 1- and 3-months postdischarge relative to admission. The FIM, KPS, and DRS did not show significant correlation with the FACT-BR. Ninety percent of patients were initially discharged to a home environment. Conclusion: Although patients make functional gains during and after inpatient rehabilitation, gains in QOL are not significant until 1 month postdischarge. QOL does not appear to correlate well with functional outcomes. Further, the KPS is less sensitive than the FIM and DRS in detecting change in functional status.
AB - Objectives: To determine the relationship between functional outcome and quality of life (QOL) in patients with brain tumors receiving inpatient rehabilitation, and to assess the sensitivity of 4 assessment tools in measuring changes in that population. Design: Prospective study using longitudinal data collected from consecutively admitted patients. Setting: Acute inpatient rehabilitation unit. Participants: Ten patients with primary brain tumors admitted to an acute inpatient rehabilitation unit. Interventions: Patients participated in an inpatient interdisciplinary rehabilitation program that used the following disciplines: occupational therapy, rehabilitation therapy, recreational therapy, speech therapy, physical therapy, rehabilitation nursing and case management. Main Outcome Measures: The FIM™ instrument, Disability Rating Scale (DRS), Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPS), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Brain (FACT-BR). Results: Improvement in total functional outcome was indicated by all 3 functional measures (FIM: F = 46.84, p <.05; DRS: F = 19.25, p <.05; KPS: F = 10.11, p <.05). Significant improvements were found between admission and discharge scores for the FIM and DRS. The KPS revealed significant improvement between admission and 3-month follow-up scores. All admission and discharge functional scales (FIM, DRS, KPS) correlated significantly with each other. No significant change was noted in the FACT-BR between admission and discharge scores, but FACT-BR scores did improve at 1- and 3-months postdischarge relative to admission. The FIM, KPS, and DRS did not show significant correlation with the FACT-BR. Ninety percent of patients were initially discharged to a home environment. Conclusion: Although patients make functional gains during and after inpatient rehabilitation, gains in QOL are not significant until 1 month postdischarge. QOL does not appear to correlate well with functional outcomes. Further, the KPS is less sensitive than the FIM and DRS in detecting change in functional status.
KW - Activities of daily living
KW - Brain neoplasms
KW - Quality of life
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Treatment outcome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034750877&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034750877&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/apmr.2001.26613
DO - 10.1053/apmr.2001.26613
M3 - Article
C2 - 11689973
AN - SCOPUS:0034750877
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 82
SP - 1540
EP - 1546
JO - Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
JF - Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
IS - 11
ER -