Gap analyses to support ex situ conservation of genetic diversity in Magnolia, a flagship group

Eduardo Cires*, Yannick De Smet, Candela Cuesta, Paul Goetghebeur, Suzanne Sharrock, Douglas Gibbs, Sara Oldfield, Andrea Kramer, Marie Stéphanie Samain

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

Worldwide about one third of all plant species is estimated to be threatened with extinction. Plants are generally under-represented in conservation. However, the global strategy for plant conservation (GSPC) sets forth 16 targets to halt the current and continuing loss of plant diversity within a framework for actions at global, regional, national and local levels. Target 8 of the GSPC directs that at least 75 % of threatened plant species be present in ex situ collections by 2020, but this target is far from being met. By analyzing where gaps in ex situ collections and research exist relative to diversity hotspots of threatened species, it is possible to identify and prioritize action. We undertake a gap analysis of ex situ collection needs in the genus Magnolia, a relatively well-known and valuable genus. Results indicate three main areas of biodiversity (China, Vietnam and Colombia) for the endangered Magnolia taxa. The present paper provides a critical overview of recent conservation activities carried out in the genus Magnolia throughout the world, focusing on genetic diversity analyses of the species.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)567-590
Number of pages24
JournalBiodiversity and Conservation
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 20 2013

Keywords

  • Biodiversity loss
  • Conservation
  • IUCN
  • Magnolia
  • Red List
  • Threatened species

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gap analyses to support ex situ conservation of genetic diversity in Magnolia, a flagship group'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this