Gender and the Evaluation of Leaders: A Meta-Analysis

Alice H. Eagly*, Mona G. Makhijani, Bruce G. Klonsky

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

852 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article reviews research on the evaluation of women and men who occupy leadership roles. In these experiments, the characteristics of leaders other than their sex were held constant, and the sex of the leader was varied. These experiments thus investigated whether people are biased against female leaders and managers. Although this research showed only a small overall tendency for subjects to evaluate female leaders less favorably than male leaders, this tendency was more pronounced under certain circumstances. Specifically, women in leadership positions were devalued relative to their male counterparts when leadership was carried out in stereotypically masculine styles, particularly when this style was autocratic or directive. In addition, the devaluation of women was greater when leaders occupied male-dominated roles and when the evaluators were men. These and other findings are interpreted from a perspective that emphasizes the influence of gender roles within organizational settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-22
Number of pages20
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume111
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Eagly, Alice H. ; Makhijani, Mona G. ; Klonsky, Bruce G. / Gender and the Evaluation of Leaders : A Meta-Analysis. In: Psychological Bulletin. 1992 ; Vol. 111, No. 1. pp. 3-22.
@article{3ef26eaa66fc427894269caef1e57647,
title = "Gender and the Evaluation of Leaders: A Meta-Analysis",
abstract = "This article reviews research on the evaluation of women and men who occupy leadership roles. In these experiments, the characteristics of leaders other than their sex were held constant, and the sex of the leader was varied. These experiments thus investigated whether people are biased against female leaders and managers. Although this research showed only a small overall tendency for subjects to evaluate female leaders less favorably than male leaders, this tendency was more pronounced under certain circumstances. Specifically, women in leadership positions were devalued relative to their male counterparts when leadership was carried out in stereotypically masculine styles, particularly when this style was autocratic or directive. In addition, the devaluation of women was greater when leaders occupied male-dominated roles and when the evaluators were men. These and other findings are interpreted from a perspective that emphasizes the influence of gender roles within organizational settings.",
author = "Eagly, {Alice H.} and Makhijani, {Mona G.} and Klonsky, {Bruce G.}",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "111",
pages = "3--22",
journal = "Psychological Bulletin",
issn = "0033-2909",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Gender and the Evaluation of Leaders : A Meta-Analysis. / Eagly, Alice H.; Makhijani, Mona G.; Klonsky, Bruce G.

In: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 111, No. 1, 01.01.1992, p. 3-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender and the Evaluation of Leaders

T2 - A Meta-Analysis

AU - Eagly, Alice H.

AU - Makhijani, Mona G.

AU - Klonsky, Bruce G.

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - This article reviews research on the evaluation of women and men who occupy leadership roles. In these experiments, the characteristics of leaders other than their sex were held constant, and the sex of the leader was varied. These experiments thus investigated whether people are biased against female leaders and managers. Although this research showed only a small overall tendency for subjects to evaluate female leaders less favorably than male leaders, this tendency was more pronounced under certain circumstances. Specifically, women in leadership positions were devalued relative to their male counterparts when leadership was carried out in stereotypically masculine styles, particularly when this style was autocratic or directive. In addition, the devaluation of women was greater when leaders occupied male-dominated roles and when the evaluators were men. These and other findings are interpreted from a perspective that emphasizes the influence of gender roles within organizational settings.

AB - This article reviews research on the evaluation of women and men who occupy leadership roles. In these experiments, the characteristics of leaders other than their sex were held constant, and the sex of the leader was varied. These experiments thus investigated whether people are biased against female leaders and managers. Although this research showed only a small overall tendency for subjects to evaluate female leaders less favorably than male leaders, this tendency was more pronounced under certain circumstances. Specifically, women in leadership positions were devalued relative to their male counterparts when leadership was carried out in stereotypically masculine styles, particularly when this style was autocratic or directive. In addition, the devaluation of women was greater when leaders occupied male-dominated roles and when the evaluators were men. These and other findings are interpreted from a perspective that emphasizes the influence of gender roles within organizational settings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0006925009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0006925009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.3

DO - 10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.3

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:0006925009

VL - 111

SP - 3

EP - 22

JO - Psychological Bulletin

JF - Psychological Bulletin

SN - 0033-2909

IS - 1

ER -