Gender Favoritism among Criminal Prosecutors

Stephanie Holmes Didwania*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Prosecutors enjoy wide discretion in the decisions they make but are largely unstudied by quantitative empirical scholars. This paper explores gender bias in prosecutorial decision-making. I find that male and female prosecutors exhibit small and statistically insignificant differences in their treatment of defendants overall but demonstrate relative leniency toward defendants of their own gender. Such favoritism at charging translates into a sentencing gap of roughly 5 months of incarceration for defendants who are paired with an own-gender prosecutor versus an opposite-gender prosecutor, which represents a roughly 8 percent reduction in sentence length at the mean. The estimates do not appear to be driven by differences in case assignments for male and female prosecutors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)77-104
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Law and Economics
Volume65
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender Favoritism among Criminal Prosecutors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this