Gender Gaps in Policy Responsiveness

Nolan Kopkin, Andrew Roberts*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Gender gaps have been documented in numerous areas of American politics, but one area that has not yet been fully explored is responsiveness, the link between citizen preferences and public policies. Equal responsiveness to the preferences of citizens is a central aspect of democratic representation. This article extends work on income gaps in responsiveness to gender gaps. Specifically, it considers whether women’s preferences are less likely than men’s preferences to be adopted as policy in the US. It uses data on preferences and policy adoptions from 1981 to 2002 created by Gilens. The main finding is a large gender gap in responsiveness. The gap is similar in size to the one between rich and poor, it is particularly large in policies related to the use of force, and it did not narrow over the two decades studied. These results show that inequalities beyond social class deserve significant attention in the study of democratic responsiveness and that aspects of bias against women in politics remain underexplored.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPolitical Research Quarterly
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2022

Keywords

  • Gender
  • public opinion
  • race and identity
  • representation and electoral systems
  • women and politics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender Gaps in Policy Responsiveness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this