Glucose management indicator (GMI): A new term for estimating A1C from continuous glucose monitoring

Richard M. Bergenstal*, Roy W. Beck, Kelly L. Close, George Grunberger, David B. Sacks, Aaron Kowalski, Adam S. Brown, Lutz Heinemann, Grazia Aleppo, Donna B. Ryan, Tonya D. Riddlesworth, William T. Cefalu

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

497 Scopus citations

Abstract

While A1C is well established as an important risk marker for diabetes complications, with the increasing use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to help facilitate safe and effective diabetes management, it is important to understand how CGM metrics, such as mean glucose, and A1C correlate. Estimated A1C (eA1C) is a measure converting the mean glucose from CGM or self-monitored blood glucose readings, using a formula derived from glucose readings from a population of individuals, into an estimate of a simultaneously measured laboratory A1C. Many patients and clinicians find the eA1C to be a helpful educational tool, but others are often confused or even frustrated if the eA1C and laboratory-measured A1C do not agree. In the U.S., the Food and Drug Administration determined that the nomenclature of eA1C needed to change. This led the authors to work toward a multipart solution to facilitate the retention of such a metric, which includes renaming the eA1C the glucose management indicator (GMI) and generating a new formula for converting CGM-derived mean glucose to GMI based on recent clinical trials using the most accurate CGM systems available. The final aspect of ensuring a smooth transition from the old eA1C to the new GMI is providing new CGM anal-yses and explanations to further understand how to interpret GMI and use it most effectively in clinical practice. This Perspective will address why a new name for eA1C was needed, why GMI was selected as the new name, how GMI is calculated, and how to understand and explain GMI if one chooses to use GMI as a tool in diabetes education or management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2275-2280
Number of pages6
JournalDiabetes care
Volume41
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Funding

Acknowledgments. The authors thank the several hundred clinicians from the T1D Exchange clinic registry and the many individuals with diabetes across the U.S. who were surveyed regarding the most appropriate name for the metric to replace eA1C. Special thanks to Amy Criego and Janet Davidson from the International Diabetes Center who consistently reinforced the value of using the word management in place of control. Funding and Duality of Interest. R.M.B. has received research support from, consulted for, or has been on a scientific advisory board for Abbott Diabetes Care, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Onduo, Roche, Sanofi, and United HealthCare. His research is partly funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (National Institutes of Health grant DK108611). R.M.B.’s employer, the nonprofit HealthPartners Institute, contracts for his services and no personal income goes to R.M.B. R.W.B.’s nonprofit employer has received research funding from Dexcom, Bigfoot Biomedical, and Tandem Diabetes Care; study supplies from Roche, Ascencia, Dexcom, and Abbott Diabetes Care; and consulting fees from Insulet, Bigfoot Biomedical, and Eli Lilly. K.L.C. and A.S.B. report the following disclosures: The diaTribe Foundation receives donations from a number of manufacturers and academic institutions in the diabetes field; in addition, several academic institutions, government bodies, and manufacturers in the diabetes field subscribe to Close Concerns’ fee-based news-letter, Closer Look. G.G. has received research support from Novo Nordisk and Medtronic and serves on a speakers’ bureau for Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, and AstraZeneca. L.H. is a shareholder of Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung GmbH, Neuss, Germany, and ProSciento, San Diego, CA, and is a consultant for a number of companies developing novel diagnostic and therapeutic options for diabetes treatment. G.A. has received research support from, consulted for, or has been on a scientific advisory board for AstraZeneca, Dexcom, and Novo Nordisk. D.B.R. has consulted for Boston Consulting Group and is president of the American Association of Diabetes Educators. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing
  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Glucose management indicator (GMI): A new term for estimating A1C from continuous glucose monitoring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this