Good cop, bad cop: Using civilian allegations to predict police misconduct

Kyle Rozema, Max Schanzenbach

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    In response to high- profile cases of police misconduct, reformers are calling for greater use of civilian allegations in identifying potential problem officers. This paper applies an Empirical Bayes framework to data on civilian allegations and civil rights litigation in Chicago to assess the predictive value of civilian allegations for serious future misconduct. We find a strong relationship between allegations and future civil rights litigation, especially for the very worst officers. The worst 1 percent of officers, as measured by civilian allegations, generate almost 5 times the number of payouts and over 4 times the total damage payouts in civil rights litigation. These findings suggest that intervention efforts could be fruitfully concentrated among a relatively small group.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)225-268
    Number of pages44
    JournalAmerican Economic Journal: Microeconomics
    Volume11
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 1 2019

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Good cop, bad cop: Using civilian allegations to predict police misconduct'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this