TY - JOUR
T1 - Grammatical constraints on phonological encoding in speech production
AU - Heller, Jordana R.
AU - Goldrick, Matthew
N1 - Funding Information:
We gratefully acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation (Grant BCS0846147 awarded to M.G.) and Northwestern University’s Research Grants Committee (Graduate Research Grant awarded to J.R.H.). Thanks to Janice Johnson and Danika Paskvan for assistance in running participants, Ariana Steele for assistance with acoustic reliability measurements, and the Northwestern Sound Lab for helpful comments.
Publisher Copyright:
© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014.
PY - 2014/11/15
Y1 - 2014/11/15
N2 - To better understand the influence of grammatical encoding on the retrieval and encoding of phonological wordform information during speech production, we examine how grammatical class constraints influence the activation of phonological neighbors (words phonologically related to the target— e.g., MOON, TWO for target TUNE). Specifically, we compare how neighbors that share a target’s grammatical category (here, nouns) influence its planning and retrieval, assessed by picture naming latencies, and phonetic encoding, assessed by word productions in picture names, when grammatical constraints are strong (in sentence contexts) versus weak (bare naming). Within-category (noun) neighbors influenced planning time and phonetic encoding more strongly in sentence contexts. This suggests that grammatical encoding constrains phonological processing; the influence of phonological neighbors is grammatically dependent. Moreover, effects on planning times could not fully account for phonetic effects, suggesting that phonological interaction affects articulation after speech onset. These results support production theories integrating grammatical, phonological, and phonetic processes.
AB - To better understand the influence of grammatical encoding on the retrieval and encoding of phonological wordform information during speech production, we examine how grammatical class constraints influence the activation of phonological neighbors (words phonologically related to the target— e.g., MOON, TWO for target TUNE). Specifically, we compare how neighbors that share a target’s grammatical category (here, nouns) influence its planning and retrieval, assessed by picture naming latencies, and phonetic encoding, assessed by word productions in picture names, when grammatical constraints are strong (in sentence contexts) versus weak (bare naming). Within-category (noun) neighbors influenced planning time and phonetic encoding more strongly in sentence contexts. This suggests that grammatical encoding constrains phonological processing; the influence of phonological neighbors is grammatically dependent. Moreover, effects on planning times could not fully account for phonetic effects, suggesting that phonological interaction affects articulation after speech onset. These results support production theories integrating grammatical, phonological, and phonetic processes.
KW - Phonology
KW - Psycholinguistics
KW - Speech production
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911998710&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84911998710&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3758/s13423-014-0616-3
DO - 10.3758/s13423-014-0616-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 24687733
AN - SCOPUS:84911998710
SN - 1069-9384
VL - 21
SP - 1576
EP - 1582
JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
IS - 6
ER -