Graphene versus Oxides for transparent electrode applications

V. E. Sandana; D. J. Rogers; F. Hosseini Teherani; P. Bove; M. Razeghi

doi:10.1117/12.2012865

Graphene versus Oxides for transparent electrode applications

V. E. Sandana, D. J. Rogers, F. Hosseini Teherani, P. Bove, M. Razeghi

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Due to their combination of good electrical conductivity and optical transparency, Transparent Conducting Oxides (TCOs) are the most common choice as transparent electrodes for optoelectronics applications. In particular, devices, such as LEDs, LCDs, touch screens and solar cells typically employ indium tin oxide. However, indium has some significant drawbacks, including toxicity issues (which are hampering manufacturing), an increasing rarefication (due to a combination of relative scarcity and increasing demand [1]) and resulting price increases. Moreover, there is no satisfactory option at the moment for use as a p-type transparent contact. Thus alternative materials solutions are actively being sought. This review will compare the performance and perspectives of graphene with respect to TCOs for use in transparent conductor applications.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	Oxide-Based Materials and Devices IV
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2012865
State	Published - 2013
Event	Oxide-Based Materials and Devices IV - San Francisco, CA, United States Duration: Feb 3 2013 → Feb 6 2013

Publication series

Name	Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
Volume	8626
ISSN (Print)	0277-786X

Other

Other	Oxide-Based Materials and Devices IV
Country/Territory	United States
City	San Francisco, CA
Period	2/3/13 → 2/6/13

Keywords

Graphene
Indium Tin Oxide
Transparent Conducting Oxides
Transparent conductor applications

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
Condensed Matter Physics
Computer Science Applications
Applied Mathematics
Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Access to Document

10.1117/12.2012865

Cite this

@inproceedings{537debf218754fa3a8fedb22c23b45da,

title = "Graphene versus Oxides for transparent electrode applications",

abstract = "Due to their combination of good electrical conductivity and optical transparency, Transparent Conducting Oxides (TCOs) are the most common choice as transparent electrodes for optoelectronics applications. In particular, devices, such as LEDs, LCDs, touch screens and solar cells typically employ indium tin oxide. However, indium has some significant drawbacks, including toxicity issues (which are hampering manufacturing), an increasing rarefication (due to a combination of relative scarcity and increasing demand [1]) and resulting price increases. Moreover, there is no satisfactory option at the moment for use as a p-type transparent contact. Thus alternative materials solutions are actively being sought. This review will compare the performance and perspectives of graphene with respect to TCOs for use in transparent conductor applications.",

keywords = "Graphene, Indium Tin Oxide, Transparent Conducting Oxides, Transparent conductor applications",

author = "Sandana, {V. E.} and Rogers, {D. J.} and Teherani, {F. Hosseini} and P. Bove and M. Razeghi",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.1117/12.2012865",

language = "English (US)",

isbn = "9780819493958",

series = "Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering",

booktitle = "Oxide-Based Materials and Devices IV",

note = "Oxide-Based Materials and Devices IV ; Conference date: 03-02-2013 Through 06-02-2013",

}

Sandana, VE, Rogers, DJ, Teherani, FH, Bove, P & Razeghi, M 2013, Graphene versus Oxides for transparent electrode applications. in Oxide-Based Materials and Devices IV., 862603, Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 8626, Oxide-Based Materials and Devices IV, San Francisco, CA, United States, 2/3/13. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2012865

TY - GEN

T1 - Graphene versus Oxides for transparent electrode applications

AU - Sandana, V. E.

AU - Rogers, D. J.

AU - Teherani, F. Hosseini

AU - Bove, P.

AU - Razeghi, M.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Due to their combination of good electrical conductivity and optical transparency, Transparent Conducting Oxides (TCOs) are the most common choice as transparent electrodes for optoelectronics applications. In particular, devices, such as LEDs, LCDs, touch screens and solar cells typically employ indium tin oxide. However, indium has some significant drawbacks, including toxicity issues (which are hampering manufacturing), an increasing rarefication (due to a combination of relative scarcity and increasing demand [1]) and resulting price increases. Moreover, there is no satisfactory option at the moment for use as a p-type transparent contact. Thus alternative materials solutions are actively being sought. This review will compare the performance and perspectives of graphene with respect to TCOs for use in transparent conductor applications.

AB - Due to their combination of good electrical conductivity and optical transparency, Transparent Conducting Oxides (TCOs) are the most common choice as transparent electrodes for optoelectronics applications. In particular, devices, such as LEDs, LCDs, touch screens and solar cells typically employ indium tin oxide. However, indium has some significant drawbacks, including toxicity issues (which are hampering manufacturing), an increasing rarefication (due to a combination of relative scarcity and increasing demand [1]) and resulting price increases. Moreover, there is no satisfactory option at the moment for use as a p-type transparent contact. Thus alternative materials solutions are actively being sought. This review will compare the performance and perspectives of graphene with respect to TCOs for use in transparent conductor applications.

KW - Graphene

KW - Indium Tin Oxide

KW - Transparent Conducting Oxides

KW - Transparent conductor applications

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878207111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878207111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1117/12.2012865

DO - 10.1117/12.2012865

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84878207111

SN - 9780819493958

T3 - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

BT - Oxide-Based Materials and Devices IV

T2 - Oxide-Based Materials and Devices IV

Y2 - 3 February 2013 through 6 February 2013

ER -

Graphene versus Oxides for transparent electrode applications

Abstract

Publication series

Other

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this