TY - JOUR
T1 - Growth restriction
T2 - identifying fetuses at risk
AU - Leftwich, Heidi K.
AU - Stetson, Bethany
AU - Sabol, Bethany
AU - Leung, Katherine
AU - Hibbard, Judith
AU - Wilkins, Isabelle
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2018/8/3
Y1 - 2018/8/3
N2 - Purpose: Examine risks of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and composite perinatal outcomes with estimated fetal weights (EFW) 10–20th%, and compare outcomes using umbilical artery Doppler (UAD). Materials and methods: Retrospective, cohort evaluating ultrasound (US) EFW 10–20th%, between 2002 and 2012. Cases were identified with EFW % 10–20. Controls, EFW >20th% were obtained for each case, matched by gestational age, and US date. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression was used for outcomes. Results: Seven hundred and sixty-seven cases met criteria with matched controls. Fetuses having EFW 10–20th% (GA 33.6 ± 3.7 weeks) had increased IUGR on follow up ultrasound (OR 26.5[10.2–68.7], p <.01), small for gestational age (SGA) (OR 9.2 [6.9–12.3], p <.01), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions (OR 2.4 [1.6–3.6], p <.01), and composite perinatal morbidity (OR 7.8 [6.0–10.1], p <.01) on adjusted analyses. Abnormal UAD in cases had greater rates of 5 min Apgar <7, NICU admission and composite morbidity (p <.05). Conclusions: Pregnancies with EFW 10–20th% at the time of initial US are at increased risk for developing IUGR and being SGA at birth, with more NICU admissions and composite perinatal outcomes; abnormal UAD evaluation in cases conveyed further increase in outcomes.
AB - Purpose: Examine risks of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and composite perinatal outcomes with estimated fetal weights (EFW) 10–20th%, and compare outcomes using umbilical artery Doppler (UAD). Materials and methods: Retrospective, cohort evaluating ultrasound (US) EFW 10–20th%, between 2002 and 2012. Cases were identified with EFW % 10–20. Controls, EFW >20th% were obtained for each case, matched by gestational age, and US date. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression was used for outcomes. Results: Seven hundred and sixty-seven cases met criteria with matched controls. Fetuses having EFW 10–20th% (GA 33.6 ± 3.7 weeks) had increased IUGR on follow up ultrasound (OR 26.5[10.2–68.7], p <.01), small for gestational age (SGA) (OR 9.2 [6.9–12.3], p <.01), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions (OR 2.4 [1.6–3.6], p <.01), and composite perinatal morbidity (OR 7.8 [6.0–10.1], p <.01) on adjusted analyses. Abnormal UAD in cases had greater rates of 5 min Apgar <7, NICU admission and composite morbidity (p <.05). Conclusions: Pregnancies with EFW 10–20th% at the time of initial US are at increased risk for developing IUGR and being SGA at birth, with more NICU admissions and composite perinatal outcomes; abnormal UAD evaluation in cases conveyed further increase in outcomes.
KW - At risk fetus
KW - Doppler
KW - estimated fetal weight
KW - intrauterine growth restriction
KW - ultrasound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020460455&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020460455&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14767058.2017.1332040
DO - 10.1080/14767058.2017.1332040
M3 - Article
C2 - 28514879
AN - SCOPUS:85020460455
SN - 1476-7058
VL - 31
SP - 1962
EP - 1966
JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
IS - 15
ER -